Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

For the information available, in the specific case examined, from the point of view of data protection regulations, there is no problem in giving the councillor access to the dossier of the stabilisation process for municipal workers, provided that it is information strictly necessary to achieve its functions. However, with regard to personal data of special protection (Article 9 of the GDPR) that may be included, it will be necessary to limit access, so that no more data is communicated than is strictly necessary to achieve the legitimate purpose that justifies access, that is, the development of the functions corresponding to councillors. In any case, once the councillor has access to municipal information on the basis of the functions legally mandated, this must be governed by the duty of reservation imposed by the regulations of local regulations, the principle of purpose limitation (Article 5.1.b) GDPR) and the duty of integrity and confidentiality (Article 5.1.f) GDPR.

The complaint is shelved because there is no rational indication of the reported facts. The complainant complained that the City Council would have disclosed its data to third parties, in relation to municipal charges.

The access of the councilors to information regarding the amount and reason for the doubtful debts could find its justification in the control and supervision functions legally attributed to the councilors. This, without the need to provide the identity (name and surname) of all affected natural persons, for the purposes of the minimization principle. This, without prejudice to the fact that, once the information is known in the terms indicated, in some cases it may also be pertinent to know the identity of those affected, a possibility that would require specific consideration, taking into account the principles of data protection.

The City Council can keep the minutes of the plenary that are necessary to fulfill the obligations laid down in the transparency law published on the portal. In this case, the minutes of the plenary can be published in the electronic headquarters of the Administer along with the identifying data (name and surname) by reason of the charge, without including, according to the principle of minimization of the data, the publication of the manuscript signature. As for the time it is recommended to keep the full minutes published, this must be temporarily limited to the period necessary to achieve the purpose justifying the publication of the data. As regards the possible application for access to these acts, we should not anonymise the merely identifying data (name, surname) of the ex-registered person who spoke on the occasion of his or her position. As far as handwritten signature is concerned, access would not be justified.

Data protection regulations do not prevent the complainant from having access, if he is delegated from a trade union organisation that has the most representative status, to information on training data, professional experience, as well as punctuation with respect to merits and other valorative elements that have been taken into account in the selection process and the scores awarded in relation to the subject. In the event that the complainant does not belong to a union organization that has the most representative status, the information must be limited to the identity of the person selected in a selective process - if applicable, the worker concerned - and the scores obtained in the different merits or tests.

Complaint about the publication of a photograph on the City Council's social networks, without consent. The archiving is resolved when there is no appreciation of illegality in the treatment due to the fact that the image illustrated in an accessory way information related to a citizen participation process.

Data protection regulations do not prevent the claimant from accessing and copying the Labour Establishment Protocol. With regard to the access of the claimant to the claimed file, access could be given to his or her own personal data and, in principle, to the identity of witnesses who have spoken by providing information on the claimant to be recorded in the documentation, unless specific circumstances justifying the limitation are met with regard to these third parties, in the terms set out in legal basis IV. In addition, data protection legislation does not prevent employees or public officials in charge of processing and resolving the case from having access to the identity, since these are actions carried out in the performance of their duties. Finally, it should be borne in mind that information containing special categories of data on third parties should be omitted, as should other information on third parties that may be included in the file and that does not have a direct relationship with the complainant and the harassment complaint that he submitted.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the person claiming the inventory of licenses for major works that have been transferred to the District Archive and the Historical Archive of the Autonomous Community, along with the metadata of street name and number, petitioner, type and year of the work and architect, without prejudice to omitting those personal data of the holders of the works licenses that are not necessary to achieve the intended purpose as the DNI data of these people would be.

The complaint is archived, referring to the communication by an MMEE inspector to his superior of an instance and an e-mail presented to the City Council, as well as his incorporation into a disciplinary file, since that communication is framed in the functions of monitoring the inspector's police activity, which include making known his superior any statutory infringements detected in his area of competence.

The complaint is archived, referring to the communication by an MMEE inspector to his superior of an instance and an e-mail presented to the City Council, as well as his incorporation into a disciplinary file, since that communication is framed in the functions of monitoring the inspector's police activity, which include making known his superior any statutory infringements detected in his area of competence.