The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
48 results were found for your search terms Right of objection
Communication of information by a school on activities organised by third parties
The Foundation's communication to families and students aged over 14 years of information on activities of external entities may have sufficient legal basis in the legitimate interest (art. 6.1.f) GDPR), provided that it refers to activities or entities linked to or related to the nature of the Foundation's schools, and provided that the Foundation applies the specific guarantees set out in the V Legal Foundation of this opinion.
Exercise of the right of opposition with regard to the processing of health data by personnel who do not have the status of doctor or nurse.
It resolves to dismiss the request of the holder because restricting access to the health data of the holder, to all administrative, IT and citizen management staff of the Health Department, who may need access to it in the performance of their duties, would seriously distort the functioning and organisation of the health system. Furthermore, to the extent that the claimant also intended that the Ministry should enforce its right of opposition "in a global way and not individually", in relation to data relating to his or her health, which is treated at all Hospitals of Catalonia and Primary Care Centers, it is decided to also dismiss this claim, insofar as the Ministry of Health is not responsible for all the treatments pointed out by the claimant.
Delete medical personal data.
Since the Pere Mata Institute has reported that the personal data of the person here claiming, subject to their opposition requests, have been suppressed and therefore not subject to treatment, in this case, there is no presupposedness necessary to make this right effective, which is that the person responsible is processing data of the person who is opposed to this treatment. In these terms, it is appropriate to reject the present claim of guardianship of the law, given that the Institute Pere Mata attended to the requests from which this procedure derives, when he informed the current claimant of the deletion of his personal data dated 10/12/2021.
Report in relation to the Preliminary Draft Law on the Democratic Memory of Catalonia
- SECTORIAL AREA
- Files and documents
- PERSONAL DATA
- Data of deceased persons
- Sensitive data
- Union membership data
- Data on religion or beliefs
- Health data
- Administrative criminal offences
- Sex life
- HABEAS DATA RIGHTS
- Right of access
- Right of objection
- Right of rectification
- Right of suppression
- Public administration
- Purpose limitation principle
- Historical, scientific or statistical purposes
He does not attend to opposition law.
The CIFO Hospitalet failed to respond to any of the different requests that the complainant sent him to stop receiving publicity emails, and therefore failed to meet the opposition requests made by the person denouncing the processing of his data.
Discarding the rights of suppression and opposition to their personal data concerning the 'door-to-door' waste collection service.
The claimant exercised the right to delete before the City Council the data he had provided for the waste collection service "door-to-door". The City Council refused to delete the data on the grounds that the treatment was necessary to fulfil a mission in the public interest based on a municipal competence. But he also stated that the only data necessary to provide the service was the address of the housing.
Inclusion of all people registered at the same address in the flyers or registration certificates
The inclusion in the registration certificates or flyers of the name and surnames of all the persons registered in the same address, at the request of one of the registered persons, may be protected by the consent of all the persons affected or, in the absence of consent, in the legitimate interest of the applicant, unless there are circumstances in the specific case that, after making the appropriate weighting, should lead to the prevalence of the right to the protection of personal data of the other people affected. To this end, it is of particular importance to inform the affected persons of the communication in advance of the effects that may be exercised, where appropriate, by the right of opposition.
Opposition of a minor patient, 16 years old, to access to his medical history by his mother
Given the configuration of the right of opposition (art. 21 RGPD), it is not essential that the center addresses the minor to ask him to specify or justify his request, for the purposes of making a decision on the exercise of this right. This is without prejudice to the fact that, although not mandatory, the center may request additional information from the minor. With the information available, in a case such as the one raised, the existence of compelling legitimate reasons, specified in the rights and obligations of the holders of parental authority and in the repercussions that this may have on the provision of adequate assistance, always for the benefit of the child, it may justify maintaining the mother's access to medical history data.
Duty to the pupils of having the camera activated during the online classes
Activation of the camera during online classes can generally be considered a lawful treatment, given the obligation of schools to ensure and ensure the educational function in relation to the students affected and the fulfillment of a mission in public interest (eg art. 6.1.e) RGPD), and the forecasts established by the health and education authorities in the context of a pandemic, without the need for the consent of those affected. In any case, the principle of proportionality must be taken into account. The Foundation may urge students to have the camera activated during the online class if necessary for its development, without prejudice to the possibility that the affected persons may exercise the right of opposition in view of their particular situation.
Disregarding the right of suppression (and in their case of opposition).
The claimant made a complaint for the alleged disregard of the right to suppress and, in its defect, the right of opposition, in relation to the data corresponding to two Basic Police Training Courses. The claim is estimated in the matter of the deletion of its data for which conservation for archive purposes is not required in the public interest, without prejudice to its blocking or anonymisation. With regard to the subsidiaryity of the right of opposition, the ISPC is considered to have invoked a legitimate imperative reason for the processing of data that must prevail in the opposition of the person claiming no basis in any particular situation for the information or documentation to be retained and that opposition to the retention of the said information would lead to the same result as the exercise of the right to suppress it.
Total number of pages: 5