The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
707 results were found
Disappearance of the request to delete data from police records.
PT 10/2023
The claimant complained that the PGD had not responded to their requests for data deletion (4 in total) within the period of the legally provided month for this purpose. The complaint filed against the PGD is estimated, since it did not respond in time to its 4 requests, no pronouncement is made regarding the substance of the claim, since the PGD resolved to estimate the requests for deletion submitted by the claimant.
27/07/2023
Disrespect of the right of rectification.
PT 12/2023
The claiming entity has not accredited that it has responded to the request for rectification exercised by the claimant.
27/07/2023
Right of access.
PT 14/2023
It is appropriate to estimate the claim, since the ICS did not respond in time to the request of the claimant. Regarding the fund, it is not appropriate to make any pronouncement or require any action, since the ICS has accredited that it has delivered the documentation to the claimant in the requested terms, that is, it has made effective the right exercised by the claimant, although extemporaneously.
27/07/2023
Estimated resolution for the disregard of the right of suppression.
PT 22/2023
The claim for disregard of the right to delete data contained in shared folders in the workplace, to which the claimant now has no access, and which include personal emails, is estimated.
27/07/2023
Ignoring the right of access to police record data.
PT 53/2023
The person making the claim asked the DGP for access to his personal data contained in the files of the information systems of the Generalitat Police (SIP PF and SIP PFMEN). The claim presented by the person making the claim is appreciated, given that the DGP did not respond to his request in time and no action is required from the DGP, given that he responded in accordance with the law to the request of the claimant person
05/07/2023
Disrespect of the right to delete data from police records.
PT 28/2023
The claimant asked for the deletion of the data that appeared in the file of the scope of the information systems of the PGD (SIP PF) in relation to police proceedings that led to a short procedure processed by a criminal court. The claim is estimated, since it was based on the lack of response to the request for deletion, but the PGD is required to respond to the request for deletion made by the claimant, even if it is in the negative sense of its request.
05/07/2023
Disclaimer of the right to delete the data of the City Council's electronic headquarters.
PT 6/2023
The claimant requested the deletion of their data from the City Council's electronic headquarters, since it had already far exceeded the purpose for which they were initially authorized, collected and processed, and for this purpose requested the withdrawal of their data from any physical or digital support for which the entity was responsible. The claim of tutelage formulated by the claimant against the City Council is estimated, without making any other pronouncement or any requirement regarding the fund since the right of the claimant has been made effective.
05/07/2023
Right of access.
PT 108/2022
The right of access is estimated because the City Council responded extemporaneously and incompletely. In any case, in relation to the access to the data that would allow the identification of the persons who gave their testimony in a case of risk prevention open against the claimant, it is proposed that before giving access to this information, the City Council can transfer the request of the right of access to the affected persons so that, where appropriate, they can exercise their right of opposition to the processing of their personal data.
30/06/2023
Right of deletion.
PT 5/2023
The claim is rejected since, in this case, the main requirement is lacking in order to be able to require the data controller to carry out the deletion of personal data, since the person who requested this deletion did not appear as the owner of the personal data to be deleted. In this sense, B:SM has accredited that it has been at all times proactive, because it required the applicant to prove his identity, and has given a response adjusted to the circumstances of the case.
28/06/2023
Right of access.
PT 121/2022
The right of access presented by the claimant in which he requested to access his images captured by the video surveillance cameras is estimated, to the extent that it has been verified that the City Council did not give a response to the requester. The interested party has the right to receive a response from the data controller to their request for the right of access, without prejudice to the fact that the entity is only obliged to give access to the information of the points provided for in the different sections of article 15 of the RGPD.
15/06/2023
Total number of pages: 71