The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
127 results were found for your search terms Right of suppression
Data deletion of a minor.
It is appropriate to dismiss the claim when the complainant considers the request for deletion consisting of withdrawing or anonymising images of a minor and is credited with having carried out the appropriate actions to make the law effective. The removal of the physical bulletins already delivered where the child's image appeared is disproportionate.
It disregards the right to erase police data.
The resolution of the Directorate-General of Police which estimates the request for the deletion of personal data contained in the complainant's SIP PF file, without going into other considerations with regard to the substance, is extemporaneous, since the DGP has decided to delete its data.
It disregards the right to erase police data.
Se declara extemporánea la resolución de la Dirección General de la Policía que estima la solicitud de supresión de los datos personales contenidos al fichero SIP PF de la persona reclamante, sin entrar en otras consideraciones respeto el fondo, puesto que la DGP ha resuelto suprimir sus datos.
It disregards the right to delete police data.
The complainant asked the DGP to delete his police data concerning an alleged crime of usurping real estate. The response given by the DGP to the complainant is declared 'extemporaneous', given that the deadline provided in the regulations was exhausted by a large extent, for the complainant to be dictated and notified of the resolution. It does not go into the substance, since the resolution of the DGP has estimated the request to delete the data of the complainant.
Request for the deletion of personal data collected within the framework of a selective process.
The complainant complained that when he presented himself to the selection process convened by the City Council, he was told that he had to connect to the Zoom platform and that they would record it, while the publication of the bases governing the selection process noted that the practical test had to be oral. This person also stated that the City Council would have published in its Transparency Portal, the results of the selective process, where it was stated as not fit (along with its name and surnames). The city council's resolution, estimating the application of the claimant, is declared extemporaneous.
Right deletes police data.
The claimant focuses his claim on the cancellation of personal data relating to events that occurred while he was a minor and states that each time the police stop this data appears. The DGP has asserted that the data of the claimant was canceled when the person reached the age of majority. The response of the DGP is declared extemporaneous, where it is reported that the cancellation of the data requested by the complainant has been effective, and the claimant's right to the claimant has been disallowed from the substance.
Delete clinical history data.
The complainant complained about the alleged disregard of the rights of suppression he had previously exercised before the Chief of Amer and the Chief of English (both dependent on the Institute of Healthcare). It is stated that the IAS has not responded to requests for data deletion made by the claimant before the Chief of Amer and the Chief of English within the established legal timeframe. And when the fund, the claim to protect the right of suppression made by the claimant in relation to the said requests is rejected, given that the application submitted to the head of Amer had already been met by the IAS, and as regards the request to delete data submitted to the head of English, it could not be carried out, given that not even five years had elapsed since the date of discharge of the first healthcare process.
Request for the deletion of information linked to the resolution of a labour conflict.
The deletion does not apply when none of the circumstances provided for in Article 17.1 of the RGPD exist. Likewise, when treatment is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation (art. 17.3.b GDPR) or for defense of claims (art. 17.3.e GDPR), it is not appropriate to suppress it.
Discard police background data.
The PDB resolution estimating the request for the deletion of the personal data contained in the claimant's SIP file is declared extemporaneous, without going into any other considerations regarding the background since the PDB has resolved to delete its personal data and the PDB is required to prove that it has notified the estimation resolution to the claimant.
Discard the right of suppression.
The response of the PDB is declared to be extemporaneous, where it is reported that the deletion of the data requested by the claimant has been made effective. The claim of guardianship made by the claimant against the GDPR is dismissed.
Total number of pages: 13