Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

Data protection regulations do not prevent the complainant from having access, if he is delegated from a trade union organisation that has the most representative status, to information on training data, professional experience, as well as punctuation with respect to merits and other valorative elements that have been taken into account in the selection process and the scores awarded in relation to the subject. In the event that the complainant does not belong to a union organization that has the most representative status, the information must be limited to the identity of the person selected in a selective process - if applicable, the worker concerned - and the scores obtained in the different merits or tests.

Data protection regulations do not prevent the claimant from accessing and copying the Labour Establishment Protocol. With regard to the access of the claimant to the claimed file, access could be given to his or her own personal data and, in principle, to the identity of witnesses who have spoken by providing information on the claimant to be recorded in the documentation, unless specific circumstances justifying the limitation are met with regard to these third parties, in the terms set out in legal basis IV. In addition, data protection legislation does not prevent employees or public officials in charge of processing and resolving the case from having access to the identity, since these are actions carried out in the performance of their duties. Finally, it should be borne in mind that information containing special categories of data on third parties should be omitted, as should other information on third parties that may be included in the file and that does not have a direct relationship with the complainant and the harassment complaint that he submitted.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the person claiming the inventory of licenses for major works that have been transferred to the District Archive and the Historical Archive of the Autonomous Community, along with the metadata of street name and number, petitioner, type and year of the work and architect, without prejudice to omitting those personal data of the holders of the works licenses that are not necessary to achieve the intended purpose as the DNI data of these people would be.

From the point of view of data protection regulations, there must be no impediment in providing the person by claiming information regarding the amounts received by each of the city councillors and mayor from June 2019 until October 2022 broken down by years and by concepts.

Data protection legislation does not prevent the claimant from having access to the distribution of staff costs in the municipal budget, individually with regard to the remuneration of local management staff and staff in positions of special trust, of special responsibility within the organisation or high level in the structure of the corporation, of free designation, or involving a high level of remuneration. With regard to information on the staff costs corresponding to the remuneration of the other municipal workers, this must be provided grouped according to the corresponding levels and bodies.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the councilor's access to information on the registrations and deregistrations of the Register that occurred in the specified period, including the date of registration or deregistration, without, in view of what is set out in the query, it is justified to include the name and surname, or the ID number or the address of the registered persons, or any other data that allows the information to be linked to identified or identifiable persons. As for the councilors of the government team, they can be identified with their first and last names indicating the date on which they were appointed or dismissed, but it would not be in line with data protection regulations to provide 'access to coexistence certificates.

The City Council has acknowledged that, as a result of a human error, it communicated to the person making the complaint the personal data of the pet owners, who were registered in the municipal census of companion animals.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the claimant from accessing the claimed information that does not contain personal data, such as that relating to the practical cases that the applicants have developed or the internship program that the selected candidates had to complete. Nor would it prevent access to the score that each member of the tribunal awarded to the two exercises carried out by the person claiming or to the scores of the two exercises carried out by the rest of the candidates who had obtained a score higher than that of the person claiming, nor likewise , to the score of the candidates in the practice phase. With regard to the acts of the qualifying court, the person making the claim must be able to access their content as long as they do not contain scores or information about the candidates who obtained a score lower than the person making the claim. You must also be able to access purely identifying data such as the name and surname and position of the people who have intervened in the processing of the file, including their email address.

Broadcast by an opposition councillor, a document containing the position and electronic signature displaying the name and surnames and the ID number of a public employee.

Els Serveis Socials Bàsics (SSB) de l'Ajuntament va encarregar a una entitat externa el seguiment psicoterapèutic d'algunes famílies, sense haver subscrit el preceptiu contracte d'encarregat del tractament.
En aquest procediment també s'arxiven d'altres fets denunciats, en concret:
1) La recollida per part del SSB d'un informe que l'EATAF havia elaborat en el marc d'un procés judicial de família, en el que constaven les dades del denunciant, sense comptar amb el seu consentiment. El tractament d'aquest informe pel SSB està habilitat per la normativa de serveis socials i de protecció a la infància i l'adolescència.
2) El tractament del citat informe de l'EATAF per part dels SSB, sense haver informat a la persona denunciant. El dret d'informació estava excepcionat d'acord amb el que disposa l'art. 14.5.c RGPD
3) Cessió de dades, sense consentiment del denunciant, entre els SSB i l'entitat externa. No hi ha comunicació de dades en la mesura que l'entitat actua com encarregada del tractament dels SSB.