Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The access of the councilors to information regarding the amount and reason for the doubtful debts could find its justification in the control and supervision functions legally attributed to the councilors. This, without the need to provide the identity (name and surname) of all affected natural persons, for the purposes of the minimization principle. This, without prejudice to the fact that, once the information is known in the terms indicated, in some cases it may also be pertinent to know the identity of those affected, a possibility that would require specific consideration, taking into account the principles of data protection.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the councilor's access to information on the registrations and deregistrations of the Register that occurred in the specified period, including the date of registration or deregistration, without, in view of what is set out in the query, it is justified to include the name and surname, or the ID number or the address of the registered persons, or any other data that allows the information to be linked to identified or identifiable persons. As for the councilors of the government team, they can be identified with their first and last names indicating the date on which they were appointed or dismissed, but it would not be in line with data protection regulations to provide 'access to coexistence certificates.

Broadcast by an opposition councillor, a document containing the position and electronic signature displaying the name and surnames and the ID number of a public employee.

Data protection regulations would not prevent access to information on meetings held by the Mayor and, where applicable, Deputy Mayors; with other public officials, specifying the position and the reasons for the meeting. Nor would it prevent access to meetings held in the context of the actions of persons considered as stakeholders for the purposes of transparency legislation, including in the case of legal persons, the identity of the natural person who represents them. Information on events or meetings held with third-party natural persons acting in the name and on behalf of legal persons, for purposes other than those of the stakeholders' own actions, should be provided omitting the identity of the specific person representing them. Information about meetings with third parties acting on their own behalf should be provided anonymously.

Data protection regulations would not prevent access to information on meetings held by the Mayor and, where applicable, Deputy Mayors; with other public officials, specifying the position and the reasons for the meeting. Nor would it prevent access to meetings held in the context of the actions of persons considered as stakeholders for the purposes of transparency legislation, including in the case of legal persons, the identity of the natural person who represents them. Information on events or meetings held with third-party natural persons acting in the name and on behalf of legal persons, for purposes other than those of the stakeholders' own actions, should be provided omitting the identity of the specific person representing them. Information about meetings with third parties acting on their own behalf should be provided anonymously.

In accordance with data protection regulations, the councilor's access to the full report claimed should be denied as it contains data deserving of special protection and there are no other circumstances that allow the right of access to prevail. councilor above the right to data protection of the persons concerned. The data protection regulations would not prevent the councilor from accessing certain information contained in the requested report that would allow to know the problems produced and the municipal action to respond to them, without including the details of all the facts produced, nor the identity of the people affected.

The case file examined proceeds as it has not been proven that the City Council has leaked the personal data of the complainant to a regional median. The leaked information refers to the withdrawal of a gallon from a police officer, as well as the withdrawal of his firearm.

From the point of view of data protection regulations, there should be no impediment to providing the councilor with the information requested on the tickets, specific receipts and a detailed concept of the list of travel expenses and subsistence allowances presented by the mayor. omitting from them the information that allows to analyze or to establish certain aspects related to its health, its personal preferences or to establish irrelevant guidelines of conduct to reach the tried purpose. In the event that the justification for the trip is to hold meetings with natural persons acting in their own name other than interest groups or persons related to goods and services that may be required by the City Council, anonymised information regarding these third parties should be provided. people.

In accordance with data protection regulations, the councilor's access to the sanctioning proceedings claimed should be limited, however, insofar as the resolutions of the claimed files correspond to acts of which the mayor must report to the plenary and s have been issued within a period in which the applicant has the status of councilor, he could have access, for the exercise of his functions of control and control of the municipal action, to the information relative to the sanction imposed, the offense committed and the person responsible for the offense.

During the ordinary session of a telematic plenary session of the City Council, a councilor of the governing body revealed personal data of a councilor of the opposition linked to the possible commission of an administrative offense.