45 results were found for your search terms Urbanism
Disrespect of the right of access and opposition within the framework of a process of municipal citizen participation.
The claimant complained about the lack of attention to their rights of access and opposition that he would have exercised before the City Council, within the framework of his participation in a process of citizen participation of urban theme. The claim is estimated and the City Council is required to make effective the rights of access and opposition of the claimant and to account for this Authority.
Deenegation of access to the inventory of licenses of major works transferred to the District Archive and to the City Hall Historical Archive
The data protection regulations do not prevent the person claiming the inventory of licenses for major works that have been transferred to the District Archive and the Historical Archive of the Autonomous Community, along with the metadata of street name and number, petitioner, type and year of the work and architect, without prejudice to omitting those personal data of the holders of the works licenses that are not necessary to achieve the intended purpose as the DNI data of these people would be.
Access to the allegations that have been presented in the public information procedure of the approval procedure of the POUM and to the reports that have been issued during this procedure, must be done after anonymizing the data of natural persons (except for the merely identifying data of public employees that may appear there). The regulations for the protection of personal data do not prevent access to information relating to the classification, urban qualification and urban use of the estates on which this information is requested.
Denial of access to the certificates of inspection of urbanistic character of the Local Police and of the Municipal Technical Services
From the point of view of data protection regulations, and taking into account that it is a matter of urban planning, there would be no problem in providing the person claiming the list of acts or inspection bulletins of an urban nature carried out by the local police and by the municipal technical services, indicating the type of action that the inspector verified that it had really been carried out, the location of the work by means of the Geographic coordinates of the Cartographic and Geological Institute of Catalonia and , the date or reference of the license or presentation of the communication by the interested party.
Data protection regulations would not prevent access to a list relating to applications for licenses for major works requested from the City Council in the last five years and, in particular, to the file number, street and number of the work, date of application for the license, type of action, holder, status of processing, type of resolution and its date. With regard to applications for environmental licenses, it would be justified to access the information requested, except for the identification of the holder when it is a natural person.
The regulations of data protection would not block the access of the claimant to the report of the procedure of previous communication of works of reform or adequacy of some premises.
The complaint|denunciation is filed for application of the principles of presumption of innocence and of responsibility. There is not evidence that allows to infer that the Town Council facilitated a copy of the administrative report to|in an entity insurance company. And the access to the report that it|he|she allowed a physical person, it|he|she has its|his|her|their coverage in the public action|share that refegeix on the subject of urban planning.
Urban planning regulations enable access to the urban planning file due to public action.
The legal system recognizes the right of access -with certain conditions and always respecting data protection regulations- to the information contained in the administrative files, either by persons interested or not interested in the corresponding administrative procedure . In the specific case of urban information, all people have the status of interested parties without the need to prove special legitimacy, given the recognition in the sectoral regulations of public action, which justifies the need to have extensive information in this matter. Privileged position of the person who owns the property, in relation to which the City Council had initiated a file for the restoration of the altered physical reality, to access the file as an interested person.
In relation to the access to urbanistic reports, all persons have the condition of interested, the recognition attended to in the sectorial regulations of the public information. The delivery on the part of the Town Council of an extract|excerpt about deficiencies detected, thus how to give the interested persons view|sight of the project of works, would have its|his|her|their juridical basis in the article|item 6.1.e) RGPD.