The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
646 results were found for your search terms HABEAS DATA RIGHTS
Right of suppression.
PT 88/2022
The entity gave an incomplete response to the claimant, which only referred to the deletion of any data contained in his or her clinical history, without referring to the claimant's statements about the existence of incorrect data in a medical report.
16/03/2023
Access to the clinical course.
PT 106/2022
The complaining party initiated the present rights protection procedure before this Authority as it considered that the requested entity gave it the requested information (clinical course of visits of 12.09.22 and 21.09.22) in a manipulated manner. In this regard, it demanded access to the original annotations made by doctors doctors to the clinical course of the two reference visits. Well, in consultation with this Authority, the Hospital Clinico has stated that the information it gave to the complainant, in response to his request, is the original version of the notes that doctors made in the clinical course, and that this documentation has not been manipulated or modified. In this regard, the content of the Hospital's response was transferred to the requesting party, so that it would submit the allegations or evidence it considered relevant, warning it that, if within 10 days it did not submit any writings, it would be understood that the Hospital had fully complied with its application for access. After this period, the complaining party has argued nothing against considering their right of access satisfied, which is why it should be concluded that the information that the Hospital gave to the complainant, in response to his request, was all that was in their power. That being the case, it is appropriate to reject the complaint, because the entity gave a full response within the legally envisaged deadline, to the specific terms of the application.
16/03/2023
Right video monitoring information
IP 581/2021
The complaint is filed by the municipal police officer who complained that the City Council had not reported the video surveillance system installed in the City Hall and in the police station located inside it, and that images captured by the cameras were later used to open a disciplinary file. It has been noted that the City Council had installed the posters in the city hall and the police station's accesses, and that they reported on the purpose of the facility's safety. In this regard, the denouncing person's behaviour, captured by video surveillance cameras and leading to the initiation of a disciplinary file, is considered to imply a breach of his or her surveillance functions, and consequently to affect the security of the building.
07/03/2023
Disregard of the right of access.
PT 118/2022
The right of access that the claimant formulated to the City Council of Sant Quirze del Vallès is estimated in relation to the purpose of processing the data provided to a municipal school. The City Council alleged that the petition had not been presented in the proper way and that it referred to data from a collective.
02/03/2023
Collection of data without fulfilling the duty of information, and processing for unlawful purposes.
PS 52/2022
The right to information of the users of the entity, due to lack of documentary accreditation at the time of collection (Articles 12, 13, and 14 GDPR); and due to violation of the principle of application, due to the improper use of the data, which consists of subjective and negative comments on a group of members who wish to submit their candidature.
02/03/2023
Denying information about accesses to clinical history
IAI 3/2023
Data protection regulations do not prevent the person from notifying the data they request, regarding access to their clinical history, including the identity of the professionals who have accessed it, in relation to the requested period.
24/02/2023
Treatment of address data in electronic notifications
CNS 33/2022
The incorporation of the address relative to the domicile in the notifications that must be made through electronic means would be contrary to the principle of data minimization. In this case, it is necessary to adopt the appropriate measures to ensure that the program used to generate the notifications does not incorporate this personal data by default. It is also necessary to proceed with the blocking of this data in the electronic notifications already made to a working person, given their deletion request.
23/02/2023
Recording telephone calls for administrative purposes, by the Guardia Urbana de l'Ajuntament de Tarragona, without complying with the right to information, and disclosure of personal data of third parties.
PS 62/2022
It is decided to admonise the City Council of Tarragona since, in a call made by the person denouncing the Urban Guard of this City Council, he was collected personal data (name, surnames, DNI number and voice) and was not informed of the content provided in Article 13 GDPR. In addition, the city council is also credited with violating the principle of confidentiality since the Guardia Urbana informed the House denouncing that the "Seva Más" would have called, from the same home, to denounce the same facts. With regard to the collection of personal data, which the complainant considers excessive, it is appropriate to archive the facts since, according to the rules of administrative procedure, when a citizen submits a complaint, it must be identified.
22/02/2023
It disregards the right of access to data.
PT 103/2022
The claimant requested the right of access to his data (copy of medical documentation and medical record). The Department replied to him within a deadline, although there is no record of him providing the requested information. Following the reiteration of his request on two more occasions, the Department tried to submit all the requested documentation, but the complainant refused to receive it. The complaint is dismissed on the grounds that the Department would have fulfilled its obligation, even if the person refused to receive the requested documentation.
14/02/2023
Right to erase police records.
PT 4/2023
The resolution of the DGP is declared untimely, given that the right to erasure was resolved and notified beyond the 1 month deadline established for the purpose, without going into other considerations with regard to the substance, since the DGP has decided to delete the data of the complainant.
14/02/2023
Total number of pages: 65