Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The installation of a video surveillance system inside the classrooms of municipal kindergartens could be proportionate in the face of reasonable indications of the possible commission of a serious illegal act by a person working any of the children, exceptionally and for a limited time, and provided that information is provided in accordance with article 89 of the LOPDGDD. The person in charge, however, would not have sufficient legitimacy to install this system so that parents and/or legal guardians can view live images of the activities carried out by their children.

The Foundation's communication to families and students aged over 14 years of information on activities of external entities may have sufficient legal basis in the legitimate interest (art. 6.1.f) GDPR), provided that it refers to activities or entities linked to or related to the nature of the Foundation's schools, and provided that the Foundation applies the specific guarantees set out in the V Legal Foundation of this opinion.

An education inspector incorporated unnecessary information concerning the person's working life by denouncing in the report he issued in response to a request from the Syndic of Greuges, a move in which he violated the principle of minimisation, as he gave more information than was necessary for the intended purpose.

Dept. EDU, as the controller of the treatment, did not enforce the right of information when it collected the data of the relatives or legal tutors of the pupils attended at the UEC Girona of the Oscobe Foundation.

It resolves to admonish the Quermany School because, on the one hand, it disseminated the identity and complete number of DNI members on a selection commission, which violated the principle of minimisation, and on the other, since the publication of this information was made on a public-road notice board, so that anyone outside the educational community could access it, thus contravening the principle of confidentiality.

The claimant has the right to access the e-mails, complaints and requests to which his claim refers and also to the identity of the parents of the students who have provided information about him and his daughter, except for the procedure hearing if there is any element that prevents it. Data protection regulations prevent the claimant from accessing the complete documents specified in the claim, given that they contain certain third-party data (ID numbers, handwritten signatures and/or contact details) irrelevant for the intended purpose with access.

In the case examined, the parent's access to the certificate certifying the status of a victim of gender violence of the other parent provided in the process of registering the common daughter in the PAU would be justified if it only contained the information relating to the existence of a situation of gender violence, the person who suffered it and the exemption derived from this circumstance.

Access to information relating to teachers and students in the Catalan education system is possible to the extent that the information is aggregated and anonymized, in the terms that have been set forth.

The request for the right of access to the data of the child of the claimant is dismissed, since the right of access does not understand the right to access information or documentation that does not exist at the moment the request for access is formalised.

The report is archived in relation to the form used by the school to inform families of what computer applications will be used in the case of those confined students who have to follow classes telematically, because it is considered to be in accordance with data protection regulations.