The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
97 results were found for your search terms Public safety
Publication of the list of admitted to the selective internal promotion process.
The City Council published the list of admitted and excluded persons with identification of accepted candidates (name and surnames) in accordance with the applicable regulations and during the indispensable period to satisfy the purpose of advertising and notification, no violation of the data protection regulations is seen.
Installing video surveillance cameras in municipal waste collection spaces
The City Council does not have sufficient empowerment to install a video monitoring system in a delimited space that is part of the public track in order to control and, if applicable, exercise sanctioning power over inactive conductions relating to the waste deposit in the collection areas. In the event of installation to control vandalism against public security, it could be considered legitimate if carried out by the local police in accordance with obtaining prior authorisation from the Directorate-General for Security Administration.
Recordings done by police forces, using mobile cameras.
The recording of images by police forces, without prior administrative authorisation, by mobile devices, is covered by the rules governing the collection of images on the public road. This rule states that such authorisation is not necessary in cases of the utmost urgency and if the circumstances in the case prevent the aforementioned authorisation from being obtained in time, a situation that occurred in the case under consideration.
Report on the Draft Decree approving the regulations for the implementation of Titles I, III and IV of Law 9/2014 of 31 July on the industrial safety of establishments, facilities and products
Recordings with cameras on the outside of a microweapon.
A city council is admonished as responsible for 4 infringements: 1) to capture images of the public track through cameras installed outside the micro-weapon, disproportionately (the public pathway was captured beyond what is required); 2) to use images captured for security purposes to identify the person who had not correctly deposited a residue; 3) Because the RAT does not include all prescriptive information and contains inaccurate information; and 4) To not fully inform the persons concerned.
Access to the daily news of the Local Police by Deputy Mayors of areas outside this Police
From the point of view of personal data protection regulations, deputy mayors may receive daily news from the local police when they act in place of the mayor, in the event of a vacancy, absence or illness, or or if they are assigned a delegation of functions that requires access to this information.
Cancellation of police records
The claim for formal motives is loved, since the DGP did not give answer in the legally established deadline|installment. It is not necessary to speak about the background|bottom, since, in an extemporaneous way, the DGP loved the request of cancellation of police records.
Creation of a supramunicipal for the exchange of police information
The implementation of a system of information as|like the proposed one requires to define|describe the responsibilities of the different agents implicated for determining the respective duties and responsibilities. Although there is habilitation for the exchange of information among|between the different police bodies, always in accordance with the coordination made competent by the Department on the subject of local policemen, it is necessary to respect the principles of quality and of accuracy of the data and, previous analysis of risks, to determine the suitable safety measures.
Cancellation of police records
The claim for formal motives is loved, since the DGP did not give answer in the deadline|installment of ten days legally established (LOPD). As for the background|bottom, the law|right of the claimant to|in the cancellation of the police data is recognized that they do not require contribution from judicial documentation (unless a denegatori legal supposition coincides), and the right him|her|it to be informed of the police data that they require from the contribution of judicial documentation, with the consequent cancellation (unless a denegatori legal supposition coincides).
Access to police data
The claim is loved, so many for formal motives -since the DGP did not face|give answer in the deadline|installment of a legally established month (LOPD)-, as regarding the background|bottom, since the DGP did not satisfy the law|right of access fully, for to have omitted the concrete data, all the data contained in the file SIP PFMEN, as well as to|in the information related to the uses and the purpose of the treatment, to|in the origin of the data and to|in the communications made or that they foresee to make.
Total number of pages: 10