Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The referral to the Court, in response to a requirement, of documentation corresponding to a person other than that identified by the Court, contravenes the duty of confidentiality.

Revelation of health data to the complainant's father, the age of the person at the time of the event.

It is decided to sanction Badalona Health Services for the infringement of the principle of confidentiality, since the complained entity has confirmed that a worker from Badalona Municipal Hospital, managed by Badalona Health Services S.A, would have unduly accessed a third person's clinical history. The proposed sanction is EUR 2 000.

The complainant complained that the City Council had revealed her data to a third party (a person who ran a bar and had called her to warn her that she would take a party). He does not provide any evidence or evidence to prove that his mobile phone was indeed revealed. RA is dictated by the lack of evidence to prove the communication of the complainant's mobile phone to the third person. In addition, both the City Council and the person who called her deny that it was the City Council that had provided the data.

An undue access to HC by a professional health person is noted, which violates the principle of data confidentiality. Responsibility of the entity for acts materially committed by its staff

One entity is sanctioned, absorbing another, within the framework of the provision of a health monitoring service. He sent citation emails to various workers who mistakenly contained data from other workers.

Violation of the principle of confidentiality by the EAP Bellvitge by sending an e-mail to the entity's staff, in which a letter of complaint signed by a group of workers with their details was attached exposed personal information, without any reason justifying such sending.

The complaint has been filed because it has not been possible to prove that a worker from a public service provider company, who in the course of her professional duties had access to the personal data of the complainant, within the framework of an informal conversation with a police officer, had come to identify the complainant as the person who authored an incident in the offices of the entity. Innocence presumption.

The complaint is shelved because of the documentation provided by the SLT Department it is noted that it was the same person who, in the framework of a public health sanction procedure, communicated and authorised the data on the 'professional' mobile phone where he received electronic notification of the motion for a resolution of that procedure.

Resolution is issued. The principle of confidentiality is imposed. The Municipal Institute of Parks and Gardens sends an email attaching a high-rise appeal in dispute of a legal basis for the call for a selective process to all workers' representatives. It is sent to justify stopping the procedure, in compliance with the obligation of motivation and transparency. However, compliance with this obligation does not justify the transfer of the resource or the personal data included in it (DNI and the complainant's home).