Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The complainant explained that the Lleida City Council would have provided a third person (the new acquirer of a license) with the document relating to the "Joint declaration of change of ownership of activities", which would contain the personal data (name, surnames, address and number of DNI) of the complainant. However, since it has not been possible during the previous information phase to prove that the communication of personal data is attributable to the Lleida City Council, as the complainant stated, it is appropriate to archive the present complaint.

The complainant complained that the City Council had revealed her data to a third party (a person who ran a bar and had called her to warn her that she would take a party). He does not provide any evidence or evidence to prove that his mobile phone was indeed revealed. RA is dictated by the lack of evidence to prove the communication of the complainant's mobile phone to the third person. In addition, both the City Council and the person who called her deny that it was the City Council that had provided the data.

It resolves to admonise the Official College of Veterinaries of Barcelona, because of the violation of the principle of application, given that this entity transferred to a veterinary centre the deontological consultation that a passenger raised with the COVB, in relation to the care received at the aforementioned veterinary centre, without there being a legal basis legitimising the processing of the data of the current complainant.

Since the regulation urges the Public Administration to facilitate the use of the "sense name" by trans persons (art. 23.1 Law 11/2014), the processing of this data is not excessive for the purposes of the principle of minimisation, and may be lawful if carried out on the legal basis of the consent of the person concerned. Treatment of the "sense name", as identifying data relating to a natural person's gender identity or expression, does not, in principle, involve processing data from special categories. The identification information of the person concerned must also be dealt with in official documents (DNI/NIE or passport), in order to ensure the identification and, among other things, the principle of the accuracy of the information and its traceability.

The Ministry of Equality and Feminisms is resolved to be admonished for violation of the principle of application since it published the Ministry's website the Plan of Equality of the company denouncing, allowing the display of identifying data of the company's workers, as well as its handwritten signature.

Broadcast by an opposition councillor, a document containing the position and electronic signature displaying the name and surnames and the ID number of a public employee.

The claimant complained about the neglect of two requests to exercise the right of access that he presented to the AOC, without the latter giving him any response. In this regard, it is declared that the Consorci Administración Oberta de Catalunya has responded extemporaneously to the access requests of the claimant, as it has not proven to have effectively notified the resolutions corresponding to said requests, without enter into other considerations regarding the fund since the AOC resolved to facilitate access. The AOC is required to give effect to the right of access exercised.

The official College of Nurses and Nurses in Barcelona is resolved to sanction since the indicted facts are constitutive of a violation of the principle of Application, given the lack of legal basis for publication, and required to remove the name and surnames of the complainant from the aforementioned document, published on the institutional web