Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

With regard to the positions of trust and the eventual staff of the City Council, given the typology and characteristics of these positions, it is justified from the perspective of data protection, to provide individualized information for the remuneration concepts referred to by the claimant. , together with their identification, level and position they hold. As for the rest of the City Council's employees (staff and civil servants), the data protection regulations do not prevent the provision of information on the basic and complementary remuneration of each job, without identifying the people who occupy.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the individualised information requested by the employee representative from being communicated to the employee, indicating the identity (name and surnames) of the workers affected by the agreement on the absorption of the productivity supplement and the amount this agreement has entailed for each worker.

In accordance with the regulations of data protection it is not justified to publish the name and surnames, number of DNI and signature of the person that the declaration describes about the remunerations of the managerial charges and administrators of the entity to the effects that the article establishes 15.2 LTC, being sufficient to publish the remuneration associated with each of the organs of direction or administration of the entity.

The regulations of data protection would not prevent from publishing, a listing of the extraordinary times carried out by the members of the local one police during the period of requested time, in the notice board of a Police Station whenever this information is facilitated of pseudonomised way, without the direct or indirect identification of the workers affected on the part of third parties being possible. The utilization of the one FULL of the local policemen cannot be considered suitable since it is a matter of a numeric code that can easily be known by the rest of workers of the police dependences.

The diffusion of identificatives data, as a result of the fulfillment of the duties to advertising established in the LCSP, should reach only the name and surnames of the bidders and adjudicators, as well as the name, surnames and charge of the public worker who intervenes in it due to the charge or functions. It is recommended, by this motive, to take the made observations into account in the section V of the judgement.

The legislation of transparency would fit out to the effects of article 11.2 a) the LOPD, and of the article 6.1.c) and e) RGPD, the access to the information about the staff, the relation of jobs and the relation of temporary contracts and of interinatge not linked to any job of the entity. Regarding the complete remunerations associates with each job, the law of access would prevail in the case of the places of the high ranking officials and managerial staff, like this as the staff that it occupies places of confidence or of special responsibility in the organization, 3 including the staff eventual and hired as an advisor of all the political groups constituted from the day January 2011, while for the rest of workers an access individualized beyond the possibility to facilitate information does not seem justified about the remunerations grouped by categories or the associated remunerations to the different jobs. Regarding the name and surname of the persons who occupy the different jobs of the entity, including the staff eventual and hired as advisors of the political groups, the data protection personal it would not prevent to give there access whenever the formality of audience foreseen has been made in the LTC and no motive that can justify the denial of the access results from it.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access on the part of the person claiming from the information which it has the Administration about the annual gross remunerations perceived by the managerial charges of a managing company of public services on accountl of the administration, identifying them directly with the name and surnames, since the year 2011 until the present, if the volume of business generated by these services it is superior to 25% of the general volume of the company.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access on the part of the person claiming from the information which it|he|she has the Administration about the annual dirty|gross remunerations perceived by the managerial charges|posts of two managing companies of public services on account|bill of the administration, identifying them directly with the name|noun and surnames, since the year 2011 until the present, if the volume of business generated by these services it is superior|upper to 25% of the general volume of these companies.

The regulations of data protection personal it does not prevent to communicate the information about the whole of the recruitments of staff, with independence of the modality used, made by the Town Council during the period of 24 March of 2011 in 16 May of 2016, to loan service to the Squad of works of the Town Council and, specifically, the information about the date of beginning and of completion of the contract, the name and surnames of the person hired, the professional category of the worker hired, or the remuneration corresponding to the level or category of the job, in the terms pointed out.

When the legislation of transparency foresees the duty to publish information to the portal of transparency or the web corporative (subsidies and public helps, authorization of accountings, formation of workers, retributiva information, administrative concessions, among others), the regulations of data protection do not prevent the publication of personal information, although it is necessary to avoid the publication of unnecessary information. When the publication derives from other rules with rank of law, he will have to be to the terms that this legislation establishes, without harm which it is necessary to respect what derives from the LOPD. The advertising of information related to "any matter of public interest (...)" (art. 8.1.m) LTC), he does not authorize to publish particulars related with this, without consent or without specific legal habilitation, and therefore in principle it will be necessary to anonymize or to dissociate the particulars.