Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

Resolution is issued, an infringement of the principle of minimisation is imposed for having sent an email to the other bidders, transferring the personal data of the representative of the recurring company (DNI, personal telephone and date of birth), intrascendents for the intended purpose, which was to comply with Article 56.3 of the Public Sector Contracts Act (referring the appeal to the other interested bidders).

The data protection regulations do not prevent access to the claimed information on self-employed workers and contractor companies that have carried out work or services for the claimed City Council from 1 January 2021 to 31 August 2021, as well. such as their remuneration charged to Chapter II of the Budgets. However, the identifying data of self-employed workers and individual employers must be limited to their first and last names. The data protection regulations would also not prevent access to the name and surname and the amount of the tender for self-employed people hired by the City Council to provide services in their offices, nor to the anonymised list of workers that the contracting companies have assigned to the provision of services in the municipal offices as well as the remuneration system of this staff.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the claimant from accessing the information relating to the contracting of external legal services, in the terms provided for in the active advertising regime (art. 13.1 of the LTC), with the exception of personal information. relating to persons who have maintained or maintain a dispute with the City Council (including staff) and other third parties who may be involved or affected by the facts or circumstances which are the subject of the dispute.

The data protection regulations do not prevent access to the information claimed on self-employed workers and contractors who, during the year 2020, have carried out work or services for the city council claimed, as well as their remuneration charged to the Chapter. II of the Budgets. However, the identifying data of self-employed workers and individual employers must be limited to their first and last names. The data protection regulations would not prevent access to the name and surname and the amount of the tender for self-employed people hired by the city council to provide services in their offices, nor to the anonymised list of workers that the contracting companies have assigned to the provision of services in the municipal dependencies as well as the remuneration regime of this personnel.

Information on the wage costs of workers assigned to the execution of a contract, consisting of the identification of workers (last four figures of the IAS), gross salary, basis of contribution and justification for the payment of pay and the entry of social security contributions into the General Treasury of Social Security, in accordance with the provisions of the second and third legal bases, would fulfil the obligation of the contracting body to safeguard the employment obligations of contracting companies while respecting the principle of minimisation.

Report in relation to the Draft order approving a new version of the application of the Electronic Manager of Procurement Files (GEEC)

La persona reclamant interessava la no publicació de les seves dades a la plataforma de contractació, dades que s'havien publicat en la dita plataforma en tant que licitador -empresari individual- en un procés de contractació administrativa. En tractar-se d'una administració pública, la base jurídica que habilitaria la publicació de les dades de la persona reclamant, no és només el compliment d'una obligació legal establerta a la LCSP, sinó també l'establerta a l'article 6.1.e) RGPD (tractament necessari per al compliment d'una missió realitzada en interès públic o en l'exercici de poders públics). El dret d'oposició no es pot exercir quan el tractament obeeix al compliment d'una obligació legal, però sí en el cas previst al citat article 6.1.e) RGPD. En aquest supòsit es desestima la reclamació ja que la persona reclamant no ha invocat cap circumstància que justifiqui la prevalença del seu dret.

The regulations of data protection would not block the access to the bills and/or to the information about the the object of the contracts of rendering of services juridical external, whenever the access is limited to the personal information of third parties related with the aim of the provision in the exposed terms in this report, to the particulars (NIF, adress, etc) of the hired professionals who can figure in the respective bills. In the case of the charges elect and another staff of the corporation, it would only be possible to facilitate information about whether the object of the contract has been its defense and whether the actions are related with crimes against the public administration (Title XIX of the Criminal Code). It will be necessary to any other information to limit the access about the facts, concrete behaviors or typifications of the offenses, crimes or faults that the concrete judicial causes deal with.

The regulations of data protection do not prevent from facilitating a relation of research projects and of publications that have been carried out at University, with identification of the persons who have taken part in it, nor it would prevent to communicate to the complaining person the reports of projects follow-up and the justification of expenses, the requested bills, as well as the information about the recruitment and the remunerations included, including the identity of the persons affected. This, without harm of omitting those identification data (as the NIF or the address of the affected persons) as well as other particulars that, beyond the identification of the adjudicator or of the teachers and investigators assigned to the projects, can figure in the requested documentation and are unnecessary to attain the purpose of transparency pursued.

The access of the entity to the relative datum to the complete ordinary account number is not enough justified, from the point of view of the data protection, that it figures in the bills sent by an architect in the sinus of the execution of a contract granted by the Town Council, to the effects of demonstrating a possible irregular or illicit performance on the part of the municipal architect in the award of these contracts.