Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The installation of false cameras of videovigilància even with dissuassoris in a municipal space destined to the dump of garbages, does not mean a data processing personal, if even images are not suitable for collecting not even voices. Therefore, the regulations regulatory of the fundamental right to the protection of personal character data would not be of application to the mock cameras.

The examined regulations do not fit out in the town council to communicate to another local administration a certificate in which he makes itself figure that a determinate public employee was not immersed, in the date in which it stopped loaning services, in any disciplinary or penal report, nor no contentious procedure had pending of resolving by judicial proceeding clerk related with disciplinary reports pending of execution. However, the town council that this jar certificate, in exercise of the own functions on the subject of management of staff, requests to request the affected same that it proves the mentioned circumstances, for example, through the presentation of a responsible declaration.

In attention to the regime of cession (art.11 LOPD), it cannot be considered that there is sufficient habilitation legal with regard to the regulations studied (LRJPAC, EBEP and DL 1/1997) to facilitate copy of the complaint and of all the procedure to the secretary general of the union in what belongs the representative of the workers opened a file on, without the consent of this, in the exposed terms in the consultation, unless, besides being the general secretary of the union, he also shows the condition of representative of the workers (of the civil servants) of the Town Council. The access to the information related to the disciplinary procedure, once he has concluded this, would only be skill in the case to have the express consent of the affected persons (art.3. e) LOPD) or with a rule with rank of law that fitted it out (articles 23 Law 19/2014 and 15.1 Law 19/2013).

The legislation sanitary and of social services can fit out the communication of determinate data without consent of the ones affected, whenever the coordination between the welfare services and the social services requires it like this. Only the communication, on the part of the social services in the File, of data of persons attended to by both services that they have received would be legitimate or they receive a specific service that has some repercussion or impact in its attention medical and limited to the data strictly necessary. The LSS can fit out the access and consultation on the part of the social services to the data of the HC of determinate persons, in determinate suppositions. Unless the "cuidadores persons" show and can prove that it have the legal representation, that they are tutors or that they can act in name and representation of the affected one, it does not seem that they can loan the consent or exercise the rights I ARCO in the name of a person admitted in a residence.

The diffusion of the sessions of the plenum of the Town Council has to limit to the sessions or part of the sessions that have public character, so that it allows to inform the citizens about the matters that struggle to the plenum without this having to mean unjustified sacrifices to the protection of data upward of personal character of the assistants or of the persons affected by the information that it can turn up in the debates of the sessions of the plenum.

From the point of view of the regulations of data of personal character protection, the collection of information about the health of the pupils in the foreseen terms to the model of analyzed report, he can find educational and guiding of the centers coverage in the foreseen data processing of the pupils to the educational legislation to carry out the functions.

The recording of the sessions of the Board of staff as an auxiliary mechanism to facilitate the writing of the minutes does not require the consent of the affected ones. Yes this consent is necessary for its posterior diffusion in the Intranet, without harm that those parts of the sessions that do not contain particulars that cannot be an object of diffusion can be issued in deferred. The diffusion of the minutes of the Board of staff where only the adopted agreements and the identification of the members who have taken part in the session figure is in agreement with the LOPD whenever these understand information of work nature of general interest of the workers.

The examined manual establishes a series of rules and recommendations about the correct functioning of the tools of work put at the disposal of the workers of the public administration, informs for them about the mechanisms of control that this can make in relation to this use, as well as of the consequences of an undue use of these tools, for which he considers itself, in general terms, in agreement with the regulations of data protection.

The exercise of the law of access of a citizen about the persons who have asked for access to its clinical history, allows to know persons foreign to the entity that treats its data, but does not include the communication of the concrete persons who as a staff of this entity have had access there if the data have communicated. In case one has been produced loss or undue access to the information of the person, the responsible for the file or treatment is that one who has to establish the appropriate mechanisms to make this undue access cease and, if it is proper, to require the corresponding internal responsibilities to the causer of the same one, although the valid regulations do not establish the duty to communicate the persons affected of the losses or undue accesses to the information that it affects them.