17 results were found for your search terms Education centre
Una madre denunció que la escuela había pedido que el primer día del curso escolar 2021-2022 aportaran el certificado de vacunación de covid-19 de su hijo menor de edad (de 12 años o más); que el dedo certificado también se pedía al personal de la escuela, y que la escuela tenía acceso a la aplicación informática Traçacovid. La denuncia se archiva porque, si bien se cierto que inicialmente la escuela se lo pidió, antes de iniciar el curso escolar comunicó a las madres y padres de alumnos que no lo aportaran (en base a una modificación de última hora del Plan de actuación para el curso 2021‐2022 para centros educativos en el marco de la pandemia); por otro lado, también se archiva porque no hay constancia que la escuela hubiera recogido ningún certificado de vacunación, y que la escuela negó tanto que requiriera el certificado a su personal, como haber accedido a la Traçacovid, y tampoco constan indicios. Además de los motivos de archivo, se concluye que el tratamiento de datos de salud por parte de los centros educativos por motivo de la gestión de los casos positivos de covid-19, estaría amparada por los 6.1.e) y 9.2.g) y y) del RGPD.
The CC Baix Camp sent an email to the School and another to the AMPA of the Center, identifying the complainant as the person who would have lodged a complaint to the Sindic of Greuges about the prices of the school menu, and attaching the aforementioned complaint as an annex document. In the Resolution, the Commission's indictment of the infringement was maintained only with regard to the communication of data that the CC Baix Camp made to the School, as it had no legal basis for legitimising such communication. Furthermore, the CC Baix Camp is considered to be able to communicate data relating to the complaint submitted by the complainant to the AMPA, under the collective agreement in which the CC Baix Camp entrusts the AMPA with managing the school menu service, and would legitimise the AMPA being able to know the content of the complaints of the service it provides.
During an entire school year, the IAS sent a student's communications and notes to an email that was not that of the pupil's parents, but to a third IAS family, which led to violation of the principle of confidentiality.
The school spread the image of the person's daughter without the consent of the parents.
Communication of official qualifications of academic in third ones different to the examined person.
The facts that they could|might entail file a breach of the integrity principle|beginning and confidentiality, because the person to whom the complaint|denunciation pointed out as|like the one that communicated the notes of the pupil in front of a classroom of students, he|she|it could not know the official qualifications and certain. L'IES also denies the denounced facts, and, there are not evidential elements enough to impute an offense (principle|beginning of innocence presumption).
The consent of the physical persons who at present are part of the educational community or who have been part,means a suitable and sufficient juridical basis for the publication of photographs of these persons in the commemorative book (art. 6.1 a) RGPD). Regarding photographs of identified physical persons or identifiable that are not part of the educational community any more, its publication in the commemorative book can find sufficient juridical basis in the article 6.1.f) RGPD, in connection with the HIM 1/1982, without having to have the consent of the ones affected, whenever the Foundation applies specific guarantees.
In view of the regulations of data protection of personal character, the access on the part of the school is not justified to the relation of the beneficiary persons of the subsidies for the acquisition of school equipment of the schooled pupils in centers funded with public funds of the town, beyond those suppositions in which the access has the consent of the beneficiaries as a juridical basis. All this without harm that information anonymized with respect to the beneficiaries for the subsidies can give to itself in the school.
The School published during an indeterminate time but at least, until February of year 2018, a series of videos that collected images and/or sees of minors, attracted during the concert of Christmas, without having the consent of its progenitors/him since in the model of authorization he did not specify the Canal You Tube that the data could also be published.
Report in relation to the Protocol of prevention, detection and performance in the face of situations of violence towards workers dependent on the Department of Education that loan services in public educational centers and educational services, produced as a consequence of the exercise of its functions, and of damages in the goods of the Administration, caused by members of the educational community and/or third
Report in relation to the Project of decree of the educational attention to the students within the framework of an inclusive educational system