32 results were found for your search terms Administrative file
Resolution is issued due to violation of the principle of confidentiality because a Consocio's collector, within the framework of a delegation of competences in matters of management and collection of taxes of the Bolvir City Council, sent emails to a wrong email address, linked to a particular, that contained personal data of taxpayers of the municipality of Bolvir.
Taking into consideration the terms in which the complaint is made and the relevant elements, the data protection regulations prevent access by the claimant to the full content of the dossiers of patrimonial responsibility processed by the City Council between 2007 and 2022 that affect a particular person, and to the information relating to the judicial proceedings that may have arisen. However, information could be provided on the number of liability files referred to in the consultation, the meaning of the resolution and, if applicable, compensation, as well as whether legal proceedings have been taken.
A city council initiated the use of a computer application developed by a private company for the management of files processed by the municipal service of home care and dependency, without signing a contract of processor and without taking the necessary measures to detect that it sent emails to a particular company with user data from that service.
The person making the claim has the right to access the information contained in the file of the call in which they have participated, excluding documentation containing specially protected personal data, as well as those identifying or other data that are unnecessary to achieve the purpose pursued It is not justified for the person making the claim to access the information relating to applicants who have obtained a final score lower than that of the person making the claim, except for that which has been the subject of publication in accordance with current regulations.
Data protection regulations do not prevent the claimant from having access to the payable persons, the pay tables and the pay associated with each job, in terms of productivity supplements, in this case, data protection regulations do not prevent individual access, in accordance with the civil service rules, which expressly stipulate that the amount received by each official must be made public knowledge for the other officials of the corporation. With regard to overtime payments, this can be facilitated in a pseudonymised way, by listing them separately, replacing the names and surnames of working people with a code that does not allow them to be identified.
Notification of a resolution reviewing the merits of one of the candidates in the selective process by a public square, to the other candidates.
RA is dictated in a case in which the complainant requested a merit assessment review (previously occupied workplaces). The City Council rectified the failure of the applicant's score, taking into account the merits of the two previous jobs. This varied the score order of the candidates, which is why those who were affected by the alteration of the score were notified. This notification to this applicant is in accordance with the law since these candidates were directly interested and affected. In addition, they had the right of access to the file of the selective process, which is why, regardless of whether the city council had notified this resolution or not, they were able to access the information.
The right to data protection does not prevent the claimant from accessing and obtaining copies, in the terms stated, of the information relating to the selective processes of the employees of the Rabós City Council with regard to the type of tests to be carried out, the bases of each selective process and the publications in the corresponding official journals that have been the subject of publication in accordance with the current regulations, referring to the candidates who have finally been selected. However, access to the content of the tests carried out by each candidate in the personnel selection procedures, as well as to each candidate's contracts, is not justified.
The claimant, who had applied for access to his entire dossier, complained that the Comarcal Council had responded late and partially. The response is stated to be extemporaneous, as the delay in the response cannot be attributed to the claimant's action. In substance, the right to access the following documentation is recognized: 1) a complaint letter submitted by the claimant, and the documentation derived from it; 2) the notes of the professionals that reflect the content of the interviews conducted to the claimant, and those whose revelation does not harm the claimant's interests; 3) the social services reports relating to the claimant; 4) the claim he submitted to the Regidic de Greuges and the documentation that derived it, since his object is closely linked to the file in respect of what the request was made.
The claim of the ex-worker of the City Council is estimated, since the City Council handed him a copy of two works documents to his personal file, but did not provide him with a copy of all the personal data recorded in his file corresponding to the period in which he was working in the City Council, as the claimant had requested in his application.
Based on the information available, the regulations do not allow the claimant (and complainant of the facts) to access the reserved information file related to the investigation of facts allegedly constituting workplace harassment. However, you can access the documentation relating to the recusal incidents that you have promoted.