Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The complainant received correspondence from Mrs. (...) at her home, since the Central Register of Insurance, which is dependent on the Catalan Health Service, recorded this address for the effects of notifications.

From the point of view of data protection regulations, there should be no impediment to providing the person making the claim with information on the supporting documents for representation expenses (tickets, specific supporting documents) made by the person holding the mayor's office or of the various councils and other municipal positions, omitting the information that allows to analyze or establish certain aspects related to your health, to your personal preferences or to establish non-pertinent guidelines for behavior to achieve the intended purpose. Nor would the data protection regulations prevent access to the data of third-party natural persons that may appear in invoices or other supporting documentation, nor to the name and surname and, where appropriate, the position, of the third-party persons with whom 'has made the expenditure.

The access and obtaining of a copy, by the Personnel Board, of the documentation certifying the merits alleged by the people participating in a provision process does not comply with the data protection regulations, due to the which should limit the query to the identity of the people who have obtained a job and the scores obtained in the different merits assessed.

The principle of confidentiality is imputed. The Mayor of the City Council of Parets del Vallès sent a masive mail to all workers and companies linked, without making use of hidden copying and, consequently, by disseminating the emails of the recipients, including some private ones.

File resolution dictated. The whistleblower complained that the department in which he worked sent him an SMS and a Whatsapp without him having authorized this treatment. RA is dictated on the basis of the consent and application of the treatment. The worker submitted two applications for compatibility with private activity on which the mobile phone was provided. After the period of suspension of his contract for very serious infringement, he asked for reinsertion in active service. In this context, he was sent an SMS notice notice of the resolution of the reinking request. And then, seeing that he had not rejoined the job, he was sent a whatsapp.

The recording of images by police forces, without prior administrative authorisation, by mobile devices, is covered by the rules governing the collection of images on the public road. This rule states that such authorisation is not necessary in cases of the utmost urgency and if the circumstances in the case prevent the aforementioned authorisation from being obtained in time, a situation that occurred in the case under consideration.

The claim of the claimant is estimated, since according to Article 15 of the RGPD he would have the right to access, in any case, information that might contain his or her child's clinical history or medical reports, without prejudice to any limitations provided for in Article 23 of the RGPD. The ICS must respond to the right of access to the requested personal data and provide a copy of the information requested of the claimant.

The request for the right of access to the data of the child of the claimant is dismissed, since the right of access does not understand the right to access information or documentation that does not exist at the moment the request for access is formalised.

Minimization is imputed because excessive data has been published in the city council's transparency portal. In particular, he published:- Statements of elected office assets including personal address, bank account numbers, etc.- Class sheets of elected office also with unnecessary data such as phones and personal emails, private addresses, CV with personal data and without prior anonymisation, and links to personal social network accounts.