Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The data protection regulations do not prevent access to information relating to the call and the bases of the selective processes carried out by the City Council, the rest of the acts of the processes subject to publication and, in particular, to the results of the called processes. Now, taking into consideration the circumstances that come together in the particular case, from the point of view of the general purpose of transparency, access to the tests carried out by the candidates in each of the selective processes, nor to the contracts of formalized work

The access and obtaining of a copy, by the Personnel Board, of the documentation certifying the merits alleged by the people participating in a provision process does not comply with the data protection regulations, due to the which should limit the query to the identity of the people who have obtained a job and the scores obtained in the different merits assessed.

Data protection regulations do not preclude access to certain information relating to the appointments of temporary and career civil servants, to temporary assignments, to the assignment of functions, to the assignment of functions or to the commission of services; information on the financial supplements for the jobs provided by the system of temporary assignment or assignment of functions and the list of staff admitted to the training activities organized or financed by the City Council, including the expenditure incurred by the City Council.

The data protection regulations do not prevent you from communicating to the trade union section of the City Council, the information you request about the relationship of Technical Services jobs with the descriptive files with the first and last names of the people who occupy the different jobs whether permanent, interim or temporary and the positions that are vacant, as well as the duration of the interim or temporary relationship of each one with the city council, for the fulfillment of the functions of the workers' representatives. In any case, the hearing procedure must be granted as provided for in article 31.1 of the LTC to find out if there is a specific personal circumstance that justifies the limitation of the right of access.

The complainant can access and obtain a copy of the theoretical exercises and the practical case carried out by the two participants in the selection process who have obtained the best score on their own, as this is information relevant to the control of the performance of the selection body and for the defense of its interests.

Personal data protection regulations do not prevent the complainant from accessing the requested information for the period in which he or she was a member of the Faculty and the School Board, regardless of whether or not he or she attended the sessions. exclude the contact and location details of the other members listed in the calls, as well as the incidents associated with these communications. With regard to the period in which he was not a member of these bodies, the data protection regulations do not prevent access to the documentation, including the merely identifying data of the secretary and president of the School Board and the Faculty and other members. of these collegiate bodies. However, in addition to deleting the contact and location details of the other members listed in the calls, as well as the associated incidents, it will be necessary to anonymize the data relating to minors and limit access to information containing special categories. of data in terms of Article 23 LTC, as well as the projects of the candidates for management.

In accordance with the regulations of data protection it is necessary to the object information of the claim consistent in the contents of the tests made by two candidates, identified with its DNI, in a procedure of staff selection to deny the access.

In accordance with data protection regulations, access to the information subject to the complaint must be denied, consisting of the content of the tests carried out by two candidates, identified with their DNI, in a personnel selection procedure.

The data protection regulations do not preclude knowing, in the terms set out, the information contained in the list of jobs, as well as the information relating to the access procedure regarding the identity and scores obtained and the date of their appointment. or, where applicable, the part of the transfer agreements that accredits the assignment of a worker to the entity. On the other hand, access to the identity and scores of the other persons who had taken part in the selection processes would not be justified or, given the circumstances of the particular case, the details of the members of the Joint Committee, the details of the rest of the transferred personnel, or other data of the worker affected by the request on her contractual situation, seniority or administrative situation that could appear in the referred transfer agreements.

The data protection regulations would not prevent the access of the staff delegate to the merely identifying data of the public employees who have participated in the selection process to which the complaint refers, and to the personal information of the participants that must be the subject of publication in accordance with current regulations.