The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
51 results were found for your search terms Right of objection
Opposition of a minor patient, 16 years old, to access to his medical history by his mother
CNS 17/2021
Given the configuration of the right of opposition (art. 21 RGPD), it is not essential that the center addresses the minor to ask him to specify or justify his request, for the purposes of making a decision on the exercise of this right. This is without prejudice to the fact that, although not mandatory, the center may request additional information from the minor. With the information available, in a case such as the one raised, the existence of compelling legitimate reasons, specified in the rights and obligations of the holders of parental authority and in the repercussions that this may have on the provision of adequate assistance, always for the benefit of the child, it may justify maintaining the mother's access to medical history data.
26/03/2021
Duty to the pupils of having the camera activated during the online classes
CNS 11/2021
Activation of the camera during online classes can generally be considered a lawful treatment, given the obligation of schools to ensure and ensure the educational function in relation to the students affected and the fulfillment of a mission in public interest (eg art. 6.1.e) RGPD), and the forecasts established by the health and education authorities in the context of a pandemic, without the need for the consent of those affected. In any case, the principle of proportionality must be taken into account. The Foundation may urge students to have the camera activated during the online class if necessary for its development, without prejudice to the possibility that the affected persons may exercise the right of opposition in view of their particular situation.
23/03/2021
Disregarding the right of suppression (and in their case of opposition).
PT 57/2020
The claimant made a complaint for the alleged disregard of the right to suppress and, in its defect, the right of opposition, in relation to the data corresponding to two Basic Police Training Courses. The claim is estimated in the matter of the deletion of its data for which conservation for archive purposes is not required in the public interest, without prejudice to its blocking or anonymisation. With regard to the subsidiaryity of the right of opposition, the ISPC is considered to have invoked a legitimate imperative reason for the processing of data that must prevail in the opposition of the person claiming no basis in any particular situation for the information or documentation to be retained and that opposition to the retention of the said information would lead to the same result as the exercise of the right to suppress it.
11/03/2021
Digital Document Treatment, Videovigilance
IP 325/2019
The part of the complaint relating to the treatment of images recorded by video surveillance cameras in the municipality is archived, because when the complainant submitted applications for the right of access (art.15 GDPR) and opposition right (art.21 GDPR) the cameras were not yet working. Nor can the city council be held responsible for the actions of an agent who had archival documents concerning third parties in his digital folder, as it would be to demand an almost impossible degree of diligence to control the contents of all personal folders of agents. Advertisement to the City Council (Art.58.2.a GDPR) and is required to remove undue documentation, and it is proposed to initiate disciplinary actions (Art.77.3 LOPDGDD).
04/03/2021
Publishing to the electronic headquarters of a selective process act.
PT 34/2020
The claim is estimated, and it is stated that the City Council responded extemporaneously to the application of the opposition, and as regards the substance, the right of the person claiming that the City Council should depopulate from the Portal of Transparency the act with the result of the selective process, all the time that the process ended more than a year ago and that, as a result, the purpose justifying its publication has been fulfilled.
23/02/2021
Access on the part of the denounced person to the data of the accusing person.
39/2020
Revelation made in the sinus of a reserved information. No attention on the part of the Town Council of the law|right of opposition|entrance examination exercised|exerted by the accusing person that its|his|her|their data were not revealed. Breach of the principle|beginning of confidentiality.
15/12/2020
New Resolution
Given the terms in that it is formulated the request is necessary to consider that the requesting person is exercising the law|right of opposition|entrance examination in front of the Town Council, since its|his|her|their will is the one of opposing to a determinate treatment, the publication of its|his|her|their data, option expressly collected in the article|item 21 of the RGPD. The exercise upward of suppression the diffusion|broadcast would entail that the Town Council eliminates these data of any support from the Town Council in which they can figure, while in the opposition|entrance examination it is only intended to avoid a determinate treatment, in this case across internet. For the exercise upward of opposition|entrance examination the data of the requesting person have to be an object of a treatment based on what orders article|item 6.1 letters e) or f) of the RGPD. The exercise of opposition|entrance examination is upward related with the existence of particular circumstances of the requesting person.
30/11/2020
Report in relation to the Draft Decree approving the Regulation of the Official Journal of the Generalitat de Catalunya
PD 7/2020
RIGHTS YOU HAD DATED
Right of deletion
RIGHTS YOU HAD DATED
Right of opposition
RIGHTS YOU HAD DATED
Right of rectification
PRINCIPLES
Minimization principle
18/09/2020
Diffusion of sport events images in the web of the Town Council and to the social networks
CNS 16/2020
The diffusion of identified or identifiable images of physical persons who occupied a public charge or a profession of public projection, or of persons who turn up as merely accessory (especially in the event of images of persons under age), in events or public sport events organized by the Town Council, sufficient juridical basis (art. 6.1.e) could have RGPD), whenever the Town Council takes the considerations that expose themselves in this judgement into account.
15/05/2020
Publication of a book of commemoration with images of the school and the educational community
CNS 9/2020
The consent of the physical persons who at present are part of the educational community or who have been part,means a suitable and sufficient juridical basis for the publication of photographs of these persons in the commemorative book (art. 6.1 a) RGPD). Regarding photographs of identified physical persons or identifiable that are not part of the educational community any more, its publication in the commemorative book can find sufficient juridical basis in the article 6.1.f) RGPD, in connection with the HIM 1/1982, without having to have the consent of the ones affected, whenever the Foundation applies specific guarantees.
01/04/2020
Total number of pages: 6