Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The disclosure of data of a user of the Legal Orientation Service of the ICB is reported in a private law firm. ICAB responsibility has not been accredited.

In accordance with the legislation applicable at the time of issuing this opinion, Article 22 of the LOPD would constitute the legitimate basis for the processing of data consisting of the communication of information to the judicial police necessary for a specific investigation, including the communication of specially protected data. As for the data of the padron (sliding wheels and cohabiting wheels) of the residents of a building, it can be considered appropriate for the purposes of the treatment and not excessive. However, the request for information from municipal databases, without the specification of the information necessary for the purposes of the judicial inquiry carried out, may prove disproportionate. In this case, the city council is recommended to request the judicial police a specific statement justifying the requested information. The same conclusion would be reached by application of LO 7/2021, applicable from 16 June 2021 onwards.

The DGP communicated the Court the particulars related to the personal address of an agent of the Police in situation of leave of absence. Previously, the court had required the DGP so that he|she|it quoted the agent of the policemen|lads|police for the usual police canal|channel for which the active agents are summoned who have to loan witness as a result of a police performance|action. The DGP communicated the Court that he|she|it could not use this canal|channel, since the agent was in situation of leave of absence. The Court required the DGP again so that it|he|she communicated the particulars of the agent to quote it in its|his|her|their particular address|home. The DGP fulfilled the judicial requirement and facilitated the Court the data.

The medical sending in the Courts and Courts of the sick note of a lawyer on the part of the company or entity in the one that loans services, is considered lawful, in accordance with the regulations of data protection. The particulars contained in that will have to be the necessary minimum temperatures to attain the purpose pursued, in the terms pointed out in the Juridical Foundation V of this judgement, unless it is required by the judicial organ, in which case should be in what establishes that organ.

The judicial organs can require the collaboration of the competent social services when, during the procedure of the procedures of mortgage execution or of eviction for impagament for rent, they have reasonable evidence that the sued person and their family unit are in situation of special vulnerability or risk of exclusion social, to the effects of carry to term the eviction. To such effect, the identity, the address and the situation derived from the judicial process in which they can be can yield the ones affected, on being a data processing necessary for the fulfillment of the mission of public interest that the Law 12/2007 attributes to the social services, to the social services.

The delivery to a Consulate to give fulfillment to an international charge of the relative data to the work situation of a worker constitutes a communication of data, and has to be made in accordance with the article 11 of the LOPD. The habilitation for the communication can derive from the existence of international treaties that foresee this communication, whenever the procedure and the requirements established in these rules are fulfilled. When the transfer is carried out in order to loan or request international judicial help, the authorization of the Director of the AEPD, in accordance with what establishes the article 34.b, is not necessary) of the LOPD.