Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

In accordance with the rules on the protection of personal data, the access of the claimant to the full content of the requested files is not justified, given the nature of the personal information of the files and the persons affected. This is without prejudice to the provision of anonymised or pseudonymized information which allows the calculations made in each case to be verified and verified, without allowing the identification or re-identification of the persons affected.

Data protection legislation would not prevent access to the bills justifying expenses containing personal data of councillors as well as third-country nationals who are not part of the group, for the purposes of monitoring the destination of funds received by political groups.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access to the information about the different concepts of expense carried out by these groups and the amounts destined to each of them, including the fact that one of these expenses can be linked to a determinate town councilor. Beyond this, the information of which it is ordered attended to, from the prospect of the data protection (principle of minimization), the access with general character to the particulars of physical third parties different of the town councilors or of working persons in the service of the local corporation, does not seem justified that they appear to the bills and justificatory documentation, to the effects of controlling the destination of the funds that receive the political groups.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access of the claimant to the information about the different concepts of expense carried out by these groups and the amounts destined to each of them, including the fact that one of these expenses can be linked to a determinate town councilor. Beyond this, the information of which it is ordered attended to, from the prospect of the data protection (principle of minimization), the access with general character to the particulars of physical third parties different of the town councilors or of working persons in the service of the local corporation, does not seem justified that they appear to the bills and justificatory documentation, to the effects of controlling the destination of the funds that receive the political groups.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access of the claimant to the information about the amounts paid by the Local Advice in the different political groups. It would not block the access to the information either about the different concepts of expense carried out by these groups and the amounts destined to each of them, including the fact that one of these expenses can be linked to a concrete local counselor. Beyond this, the information of which it is ordered attended to, from the prospect of the data protection (pinciple of minimization), the access with general character to the particulars of physical third parties different of the local counselors or of working persons in the service of the local advice, does not seem justified that they appear to the bills, to the effects of controlling the destination of the funds that they receive the municipal groups.

In view of the regulations of data protection of personal character, the access on the part of the school is not justified to the relation of the beneficiary persons of the subsidies for the acquisition of school equipment of the schooled pupils in centers funded with public funds of the town, beyond those suppositions in which the access has the consent of the beneficiaries as a juridical basis. All this without harm that information anonymized with respect to the beneficiaries for the subsidies can give to itself in the school.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access of the claimant to the previous dissociation bills of the same ones, as the requesting person asks, whenever it is guaranteed that the affected persons cannot be identifiable in a direct or indirect way without disproportionate efforts. Beyond this, the information of which it is ordered attended to, from the prospect of the data protection (principle of minimization) the access with general character to the particulars of physical third parties different of the town councilors or of working persons in the service of the corporation, who appear to the bills, to the effects does not seem justified, in the supposition brought up, of controlling the destination of the funds that they receive the political groups.

In view of the regulations of data protection of personal character, the access of the entity claiming from the information that it allows to identify the beneficiary persons of subsidies and helps on the subject of housingp with indication of the amount is not justified perceived by these concepts. This, without harm that this type of information can be facilitated in an aggregated way, anonymized or pseudonomized.

In view of the regulations of data protection of personal character, the access of the entity claiming from the information that it allows to identify the beneficiary persons of subsidies and helps on the subject of housing with indication of the amount is not justified perceived by these concepts. This, without harm that this type of information can be facilitated in an aggregated or anonymized way.

The regulations of data protection of personal character it does not prevent the access to the data that they allow to identify the loaned service, the name and surnames of the beneficiary persons and the concretion of the days and hours of the service of help at home loaned for the Local Board, given the legal forecasts that attribute the Town Council the payment of a part of the cost of the service and of its duties to taxation of the expense.