Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The regulations of data protection do not block the direct access of the town councilor to the decrees of mayor's office that have to be put in knowledge of the plenum. Before the inn at the disposal of this information it is necessary to exclude the information related with special categories of data from it (art. 9 RGPD), or another information deserving of special protection (intimate information, penal offenses either clerks, or any other who it means revealing information of persons that she requires a special protection for example, situations of social vulnerability, data of minors, related data with the violence against women, or that allow the possibility to elaborate socioeconomic profiles, etc). This, without harm that there can be some exceptional concrete case in which the town councilor can justify the need of the access to these data to exercise its functions of control and taxation.

A city council is admonished for violating the principle of confidentiality, for notifying 11 people of an agreement to initiate a procedure for withdrawing an irregular ford, containing each person's name and surnames, along with the property of each where each ford was located, revealing this data between them.

La identificació de les persones beneficiàries d'ajuts públics durant el termini de 5 anys, deriva del compliment d'una obligació legal i d'una missió en interès públic, de conformitat amb la Llei 19/20214 (art. 15.1.c). Atès l'anterior, aquest tractament és lícit.

In the particular case, the City Council could have a sufficient legal basis for capturing images through video surveillance cameras in the spaces relating to the indoor and outdoor sports area for security reasons, given the provision of the Article 6.1.e) of the RGPD, in connection with Article 22 of the LOPDGDD. This authorization cannot be ruled out as existing in the case of the multipurpose room, although in this case a priori it does not seem clear the justification of its purpose based on security reasons. To this end, the principles and obligations established in the data protection regulations (RGPD and LOPDGDD) and, where applicable, in Instruction 1/2009 must be complied with. The video surveillance system in the area in front of the City Hall, the parking area and the area of the residents ’household waste containers, for security reasons, is governed by the regulations governing police video surveillance, in the terms set out.

The claim for formal motives is loved, since the DGP did not give answer in the legally established deadline|installment. It is not necessary to speak about the background|bottom, since, in a way extemporaneous and once presented the claim, the DGP loved the request of cancellation of police records.

In accordance with the provisions of Law 13/2015, in relation to data protection regulations, the continuous recording of students' images in virtual training actions in order to be accredited to the Data Protection Service is not proportional. 'Occupation of Catalonia the assistance of the students to the formative actions realized in the frame of the system of employment of Catalonia. The recording of images and voices of teachers in training actions in order to have teaching materials in order to disseminate and use them in other training, could find authorization in article 6.1.b) of the RGPD if it were a treatment necessary for the execution of the contract they have signed. Otherwise, it will be necessary to have the specific consent of the teachers, or another of the legal bases established in article 6.1 of the RGPD. In any case, it will be necessary to adopt the appropriate technical and organizational measures taking into account the risks arising from the treatment.

There is a violation of the principle of confidentiality by publishing on the City Council's website the income statement of a councillor, without having anonymized the document correctly. The published model contained more personal data than was strictly necessary to comply with the intended purpose, as well as data from members of the family unit that were not in any case to be published.

The data protection regulations do not prevent access to the identifying data of judges or magistrates or of public employees or positions that have intervened in the proceedings of the person carrying out the sentence contained therein. In accordance with data protection regulations, the general public's access to the sentences must be carried out as a general rule with the prior anonymisation of the personal data of the parties or other third parties, as well. as well as the identifying data of solicitors and lawyers who have participated in the process. Councilors have the right to access the information necessary for the exercise of the functions assigned to them by local legislation. This may mean that, after a weighting of the concurrent circumstances, they may access the personal data contained in the judgment relating to the litigant or other third parties, especially in the case of judgments relapsed in relation to acts. adopted by bodies of which they form part or of which they must be informed. However, especially when it comes to intimate information or which requires special protection, access may be denied or, where appropriate, information may be provided anonymously.

A Town Council with an admonition|warning for having harmed sanctions the principle|beginning of minimization, since it|he|she published some minutes and an engraving of a municipal plenum revealing the surname of neighbors that they had lodged contentious resources|appeals against the Town Council in urbanistic matter|subject, when it|he was unnecessary. The part of the complaint|denunciation referring to the diffusion|broadcast of the surname of a town councilor and its|his|her|their linking with a company is filed, its|his|her|their condition of town councilor attended to, the fact that part of the spread information was public, the public significance of the spread information, and that these demonstrations were made in the exercise of the functions typical of the members of the Plenum.

The holders of public facilities and/or private establishments may request, in the exercise of their function of monitoring compliance with the measure adopted by the health authorities consisting of the mandatory use of the mask in any closed space for public use or that is open to the public, the documentation that certifies the concurrence of any of the causes of exemption from the obligation to wear a mask to those who access it without a mask. Not allowing entry to establishments open to the public to those that are applicable to the provisions of Law 11/2009 to those people who refuse to show this documentation on the basis of the right of admission cannot be understood as discrimination, since they are obliged to comply with the established requirements and access and admission rules. These include those adopted by the competent health authorities, such as the use of a mask in certain spaces.