The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
707 results were found
Accession rights with extension of the initial application.
PT 34/2022
The claimant requested access to data as an ICS worker. ICS responds after the deadline, but the claimant is considered satisfied as stated in writing to the Authority. The resolution is issued that declares the ICS response extemporaneous.
21/06/2022
Request for information on the traceability of clinical history.
PT 9/2022
The claimant asked the ICS for access to their clinical history and traceability. The ICS responded once the one-month period foreseen for art had elapsed. The Authority's resolution states that the ICS responded extemporarily to the request for access, and regarding the information not delivered concerning traceability, the claim is partially estimated, regarding only information concerning data communications from clinical history (including any data communications to the clinical history shared in Catalonia), since the ICS' response was not clear enough to understand that he had been informed about this end. And the claim is dismissed as regards the other information included in the concept of 'traceability', as it is information that exceeds the material aspect of the right of access to data protection.
21/06/2022
Delete medical personal data.
PT 18/2022
Since the Pere Mata Institute has reported that the personal data of the person here claiming, subject to their opposition requests, have been suppressed and therefore not subject to treatment, in this case, there is no presupposedness necessary to make this right effective, which is that the person responsible is processing data of the person who is opposed to this treatment. In these terms, it is appropriate to reject the present claim of guardianship of the law, given that the Institute Pere Mata attended to the requests from which this procedure derives, when he informed the current claimant of the deletion of his personal data dated 10/12/2021.
21/06/2022
Right access to full file in the requested format. It is not part of the right of access guaranteed by the data protection regulation to know the identification of the persons employed by the person responsible for the treatment that accessed the data.
PT 7/2022
Partial estimate. The claimant has the right to have the person responsible for the treatment supply a copy of the files requested in the format he had requested, in this case, in electronic format.
14/06/2022
Right of access.
PT 148/2021
Estimates of the right of access to emails or other documents containing personal data of the claimant or his representative (son), because the request contained in the submitted request would be considered to fit within the framework of an art right request.
07/06/2022
Dismiss attention right to rectification and/or deletion of personal data in the claimant's clinical course.
PT 155/2021
The answer provided by the ICS is declared to be extemporaneous, by which the request for rectification made by the person claiming not to have responded within the time frame set in the applicable law is dismissed. The claim of the claimant as regards the correction of the annotation in his or her clinical course in relation to the medical visit of date 05/03/2019 is dismissed, since the requested rectification is not appropriate; and the claim as regards the rectification of his or her clinical course in relation to the visit of 26/01/2021 is estimated.
07/06/2022
Disabling the right to remove from the usual domicile address.
PT 36/2022
The claimant asks for the deletion of the 'common address' data, but the Education Department denies the deletion of this data. The Authority does not consider it appropriate to delete the 'common asylum' data because it considers that its treatment is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation applicable to the Department of Education, in accordance with the rules of public function and to practice certain notifications in that address, so that the assumption described in Article 17.3.b of the GPD does not apply when the treatment is required to comply with a legal obligation requiring the processing of data imposed by the law of the Union or of the Member States to which the person responsible is subject, or to perform a mission performed in the public interest or in the exercise of public powers conferred on the person responsible is applicable.
07/06/2022
The request to delete the information contained in the shared clinical history is dismissed.
PT 23/2022
The claimant has not submitted the documentation relating to medical health, nor has he submitted allegations arguing for any circumstances that would prevent the submission of such documentation to the Authority. In this respect, health legislation lays down the time limits for the conservation of integrated documentation in the patient's clinical history, in 5 or 15 years, depending on the type of document in question, without providing for its suppression, when the medical high is not available, which is why the claimant's request is not appropriate.
07/06/2022
Clinical history access request.
PT 141/2021
The claimant requested access to information about access to his or her clinical history (HC), and the claimed entity responded, lately, that they did not record undue access to his HC. The Authority estimates the claim of guardianship of the right of access, since the claimed entity did not provide an answer within the time frame set for the applicable law, nor did it inform him of whether data communications existed in the shared clinical history of Catalonia, or of other data communications to other recipients, whether they were external recipients to the claimed entity, or other health centers that, while belonging to the claimed entity, have information systems other than the health center assigned to the claimant.
31/05/2022
The right to access the data source.
PT 154/2021
The person here claiming complained that the City Council had not provided him with the name of persons or entities that had provided the social services with a report issued by a court advisory body (EATAF). In relation to this, the complaint is estimated to the extent that Article 15.1.g of the GPD determines that it is part of the right of access "any information available about its origin", which would therefore include reporting on the identity of the person who submitted the report (if known). However, if the City Council considers that access may be limited, nothing prevents people from being moved from what data may be affected by access, so that they make the appropriate claims.
31/05/2022
Total number of pages: 71