The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
707 results were found
Disabling the right of access to police background data.
PT 32/2022
The claim of guardianship made by the claimant against the GDPR is estimated, and is required to make the right of access effective.
11/05/2022
Disregard of the right of access to clinical history. Extemporaneous.
PT 1/2022
The claimant complained that in the face of the request for access to his HC, the Hospital had not delivered the full documentation to him. Within the protection procedure, the hospital has provided the complainant with all the documentation requested, and the hospital's response is therefore extemporaneous, without going into any other considerations of substance.
11/05/2022
Disabling the right of access by CSMA New Barris South.
PT 131/2021
It is credited that the CSMA did not make effective the right of access exercised by the claimant, since in the face of his request he limited himself to submitting to him a report from the psychiatrist visiting him, which made no reference to any of the requested endpoints, concerning the month of August 2018: information concerning the communication of his medical data to his parents, the application for involuntary membership and the interview that his psychiatrist would have held with his parents. In this regard, it should be borne in mind that it is part of the right of access provided for in Article 15 GDPR, the right to know whether or not the person responsible has the data in respect of which that right is exercised, and the right to know data communications to third parties. In the above, the claim is estimated and the claim is declared the right of the claimant to obtain the information requested from the CSMA in his files, as well as, in the event that no such information is available, to be explicitly stated, specifying the reason, and to be informed about the communication of data to third parties.
03/05/2022
Right of access.
PT 134/2021
The right of access to emails containing personal data of the claimant or his representative (son) is estimated, because the request contained in the submitted request would be considered to fit within the framework of an art right request. The claimant was entitled to receive a response from the person responsible for the treatment from the prism of the data protection regulations, which was not issued in this regard. All of this, however, without prejudice to the fact that, if appropriate, in the response that is eventually given, the limitations that may be derived from Article 23 of the GPD are applicable.
03/05/2022
Access to shared clinical history.
PT 142/2021
The Department of Health has extemporaneously taken account of the right of access to the shared clinical history of the applicant, which is why the Department's response is declared to be extemporaneous, without going into any other considerations, given that the right has been satisfied within the framework of this rights protection procedure.
03/05/2022
Do not process access request for not using the ad hoc form.
PT 129/2021
The claimant requested, through burofax, access to his clinical history and traceability. the ICS did not process the request for not filling in and signing the planned form for that purpose. The claim is estimated, given that the art. 12 GDPR does not allow the application to be denied for this reason, and as regards the substance the right of access to documents in clinical history is recognised, with certain limits, and as regards traceability only the right of access to information about recipients or categories of recipients to whom the claimant has been communicated or provided for communication.
26/04/2022
Right of access.
PT 136/2021
The right of access to emails containing personal data of the claimant or his representative (son) is estimated, because the request contained in the submitted request would be considered to fit within the framework of an art right request. The claimant was entitled to receive a response from the person responsible for the treatment in this regard, although the answer was to indicate that the entity did not have the emails subject to the request for access.
20/04/2022
Dismiss the right of access concerning technical reports by refusal of leave.
PT 13/2022
The claimant requested access to the technical reports mandated by the technical team concerning a penitentiary leave of the prison, but the Treatment Board did not respond to either request for access to data exercised by the claimant. The claim is estimated.
20/04/2022
Dismiss the right of access concerning technical reports by refusal of leave.
PT 10/2022
The claimant asked for access to the mandatory technical reports of the technical team concerning a penitentiary leave of the prison. The Treatment Board responded to requests for dates 10/10/2022 and 14/10/2022, but without indicating whether it was processing data, and in relation to the other requests (16/12/2021 and 20/12/2021), it gave no response to the claimant. The claim is estimated.
20/04/2022
Partial estimate. Subjective Annotations
PT 128/2021
The claimant complained that the healthcare center had not provided a full copy of its clinical history. The health center admits that it has not provided a complete copy of the clinical history to the patient on the basis of the right to book subjective annotations of professionals. It is estimated in part because some of the information that was not given cannot be encapsulated in what is to be understood by subjective annotation.
20/04/2022
Total number of pages: 71