The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
707 results were found
Request for deletion of denied data.
PT 29/2022
The resolution of the PDB is declared extemporaneous, which resolves the request of the claimant for refusal to delete data. It is dismissed in substance, since the judicial pronouncement of provisional oversecution, as the PDB maintains, does not prevent the police investigation from being kept open, when the corresponding limitation period has not been exceeded.
26/05/2022
Request for access to clinical history.
PT 140/2021
The claimant requested access to information about access to his or her clinical history (HC), and the claimed entity responded, lately, that they did not record undue access to his HC. The Authority estimated the claim of guardianship of the right of access, since the claimed entity did not respond to it within the time frame set to the applicable law, nor did it inform it about whether data communications existed in the shared clinical history of Catalonia, or about other data communications to other recipients, whether they were external recipients to the claimed entity, or other health centers that, while belonging to the claimed entity, have information systems other than that of the health center assigned to the claimant.
26/05/2022
Request to access original document.
PT 138/2021
The claimant requested an entity, by exercising the right of access, to hand over a copy of the document that another public entity had sent him, accrediting in the workplace his status as a victim of gender violence, as well as the original document. The claim is partially estimated as the claimant entity extemporarily resolved the request for access to the copy of the requested document, and is dismissed as regards the request for the submission of the original document, since the right of access provided for in Article 15 of the RGPD does not include the delivery of the original document, but only access to those personal data and to the copying of those data, as well as the right to copy them.
26/05/2022
Request for portability of a document to a public sector entity.
PT 30/2022
The claimant asked a Foundation, by exercising the right to data portability, to submit an original document that had been sent to it by another public body, accrediting in the workplace his status as a victim of gender violence. The claim was dismissed, as: (1) the right to portability does not include the delivery of the original document, but of the data in a structured, common-use and mechanical readership format; (2) the person concerned had not been the person who submitted this data to the claimed entity; and (3) the right to portability does not apply to the treatment needed to fulfil a mission performed in the public interest or in the exercise of public powers conferred to the responsible.
26/05/2022
Right of access.
PT 149/2021
It is dismissed because it is considered that, although the right of access application was treated as a request of the LTC, the entity ended up giving it an answer that would have been the same in case the application had been processed as a right of access under Article 15 of the GPD. Therefore, the request for the right of access, in which the applicant made a specific claim, also received a specific response informing him that the right of access could not be made effective because of the lack of information.
26/05/2022
Accessed progression denial reports to the third degree of penitentiary.
PT 16/2022
The claimant has the right to access the report produced by the Treatment Board in which it was proposed to deny the degree progression of the internal claimant here, which was provided in an extemporaneous manner.
17/05/2022
Right of access.
PT 135/2021
The right of access to emails containing personal data of the claimant or his representative (son) is estimated, because the request contained in the submitted request would be considered to fit within the framework of an art right request. The claimant was entitled to receive a response from the person responsible for the treatment from the prism of the data protection regulations. All of this, without prejudice to the fact that, in advance, the entity may require the interested party to specify the data or treatment activities to which it refers, or that the final answer may be indicated that it does not have the information requested or that it covers some of the limits of Article 23 of the RGPD.
17/05/2022
ATRI platform data collection.
PT 143/2021
The claimant asked for the rectification of their data that were recorded in his file referable to the ATRI platform as 'occupied places of work in the Government of the Generalitat of Catalonia' (administrative data section), since these were incomplete as they did not include the occupied positions licensed by the trade union freedman. The claim is estimated for reasons of form since the Secretariat of Administration and Public Function of the Department of the Presidency did not resolve the right to rectification in time, and for reasons of substance, since the claimant was entitled to the rectification of his data in the terms he requested.
17/05/2022
Access your own data and images captured by a video surveillance camera located in the Consorial Building.
PT 22/2022
The right of access of the person is estimated by claiming their own data held by the City Council, including the images captured by the video surveillance camera located in the consistory building, and the right to access images and/or voices of third people that may appear in the reference camera recordings is dismissed.
17/05/2022
Disabling the right of access to police background data.
PT 33/2022
The claim of guardianship made by the claimant against the GDPR is estimated, and is required to make the right of access effective.
11/05/2022
Total number of pages: 71