Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The data protection regulations do not prevent the communication of the requested information (knowing the identity of the persons registered at the address in question), since there may be a direct interest in confirming the registration of the two persons at the address of the co-owner in order to be able to enjoy the right to free legal assistance, and that it does not appear that the communication of the information should entail significant interference with the right to data protection of the two registered persons.

The complaining person asked for the cancellation of determinate data included in police files. The request of the person complaining, since the claimed entity has not invoked any cause that prevents the cancellation, is loved.

The Director of the Police Directorate-General's response to the request made by the claimant concerning his data contained in the Generalitat Police file of minor physical persons (SIP PFMEN) is declared to be extemporaneous. As regards the substance, it is considered that the PDB has made the right of access of the claimant effective under the terms of Article 29.1 of the RLOPD, making this response conditional on the PDB having made its notification to the claimant effective.

The claim for formal motives is loved, since the DGP did not give answer in the legally foreseen deadline|installment. As for the background|bottom, it is stated that the DPG has satisfied the law|right with respect to the diligences|proceedings of year 2012, and the claim in relation to the cancellation of the data related to the police diligences|proceedings of year 2017 is rejected, although this pronouncement is conditioned to|in the accreditation in the face of the Authority of having made the annotation related to the provisional stay decreed through firm interlocutory.

The Association may publish through the one-stop shop or communicate to third parties the information consisting of name and surname, membership number, degree, professional contact details (professional address, telephone, e-mail ...) and professional housing situation, regardless of whether they are practicing or non-practicing professionals and, in the case of the latter, whatever the cause of the non-practice. Personal data protection regulations do not apply to the data of deceased persons. Neither the regulations governing the one-stop shop nor Article 19 of the LOPDGDD allow the publication of data on registered members of the deceased, or on the heirs of deceased members, whether they are practicing or not.

The claimant has the right to access all the information about her person in the case initiated as a result of a complaint against her person, and the rest of the documentation she requests, including the source of the information, is that is, the identity of the people who provided information about it. The data protection regulations do not prevent the complainant from accessing the information and documents related to the investigation carried out by the City Council of her conduct as a defendant, although it is necessary to exclude from the access the information deserving of special protection of third parties (art. 23 LTC), as well as the personal information of third parties that may appear in the requested documentation and that are not their name and surname of the complainant and the witnesses, nor the information which they have provided relating to the claimant. The data protection regulations do not prevent the complainant from accessing the merely identifying data of the persons in charge of the evaluation and investigation of the reported facts and / or of the public employees that may appear in the requested documentation.

The alleged infringer has the right to access all the information about his / her person that appears in the disciplinary file, including the information provided or generated in the course of the confidential information that has been incorporated in the disciplinary file, including the identity. of persons who have provided such information or health data on such persons, where relevant for the right of defense, without prejudice to such limitations as may be exceptionally relevant where the circumstances alleged by such persons require confidentiality.

The council could create the contact database or third-party database to collect the identifying and contact details of the individuals it relates to. The incorporation in this third-party database of the data of the Register of entry and exit of documents would not be compatible for the purposes of using the data contained therein for subsequent notifications, but instead it could be to use the identifying and contact data in other procedures of an analogous nature. In application of the principle of accuracy, the city council must take the appropriate measures to collect the different addresses or electronic means that the citizen has chosen for each procedure to receive administrative notifications or whatever is relevant in accordance with the applicable regulations. The data that make up the third-party database may not be retained beyond the retention period applicable to the purpose for which it was collected, must be kept up to date and the affected persons must be informed.

The complainant has the right to access all the information about his or her person listed in the written complaint, including the source of the information and, therefore, the identity of the persons who provided information about the person. claimant (art. 15 RGPD). The complainant must be able to access the information he or she is requesting, that is, a copy of the written complaint relating to his or her conduct as a accused person, including the identification with the name and surname of the complainant, and excluding access, information on other data of the complainant or to identify other third parties.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the access of a delegate of a trade union organization who has the status of most representative to the information on identity data, training, professional experience, as well as the score with respect to the merits and other evaluative elements that have been taken into account in the selection process and the scores awarded. In the case of not belonging to a trade union organization that has the status of most representative, the information must be limited to the identity of the person selected and the scores obtained in the various merits or tests. However, access to certain identifying data (for example, complete ID number) and contact details of the selected person or access to the personal data of other applicants is not justified.