Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The City Council may keep published on the portal the information of ex-councilors of the corporation that may be necessary to comply with the obligations established in the transparency legislation, as long as the publication deadlines provided for in these regulations have not elapsed. Instead, it must delete from the municipal website the published information in respect of which this legal obligation does not exist, unless there are any other exceptions provided for in article 17.3 RGPD. Once these deadlines have elapsed, the historical interest may justify the maintenance of the publication of information on the names and surnames of the councilors and ex-councilors, the position they held, the municipal group of which they were part and the period in which they held office. not the rest of the information.

Data protection regulations do not prevent the claimant from giving access to information that does not include personal data (number of people interviewed, indicators used, etc.). The data protection regulations allow the claimant to access information relating to a third party from whom he proves to have consent. The claimant has the right to access all the information about his person contained in the documentation available to the Department, including the origin or identity of the persons who would have provided the information, unless the hearing procedure results. any circumstance that justifies the limitation of access. However, access to other information about third parties that may appear in the requested information does not appear to be justified, beyond the merely identifying data of the persons responsible for processing the documentation.

Access to the local team of the civil servant who is on sick leave, in order to ensure the continuity of the activity in the absence of the worker and in order to check for possible misuse of the equipment by the worker and protect the integrity of the information, may be considered lawful if justified by concurrent circumstances. It is necessary to articulate the intervention in the team of the worker, so that the access to content of private type or other people's to the documentation of the Council is avoided. Among other issues, it is agreed that access in order to ensure the continuity of the activity in the absence of the worker, must be communicated prior to the intervention, unless it is not possible.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the claimant (complainant in the file processed by the body) from knowing the status of the complaint, the information relating to the facts that have been ascertained, the possible breaches detected and the measures adopted, as well as the personal information contained in the file, including also the merely identifying data of the officials and personnel of the administration that are the documents in which they appear. As for the psychosocial risk report, it could also be accessed, given the content described, except for the personal information of the employees of the company hired by the city council for the prevention of occupational risks.

Data protection regulations do not preclude the provision of information on the seniority supplement received and the amounts or percentages of salary received as a result of old age leave by senior officials and executives of Parliament or positions that may be considered trustworthy, or of free appointment, or of special responsibility, or that imply high levels of remuneration, as it would be the case of the positions of general secretary, senior lawyer or listener of accounts. However, access to other staff would not be justified.

The claim is estimated for formal reasons, as the PDB did not respond within the legally established timeframe. There is no need to give an opinion on the substance, given that, in an extemporaneous manner and once the complaint has been filed, the PGI estimated the request for the cancellation of police records.

The claim is estimated for formal reasons, as the PDB did not respond within the legally established timeframe. There is no need to give an opinion on the substance, given that, in an extemporaneous manner and once the complaint has been filed, the PGI estimated the request for the cancellation of police records.

The right of regulated access to art is exercised. 15 GDPR, when requesting information or documentation relating to the applicant himself.Access to various documentation and information.

The persons working of determinate sanitary centers received a mail through which the possibility to adhere to a study of research promoted by the CatSalut was offered these professionals. In this mail a personalized link to which they had to connect to fill in the survey and give its|his|her|their explicit consent to|in the participation|shareholding in the study was facilitated the working person. During a determinate period, the system allowed to the user person of the survey to change the DNI to the searcher of the aplicatiu and to put that of another person, so that, if made it, the data of this third person contained responsible for the treatment the CatSalut in the Central Register|Record of persons Insured|Ensured of which it|he|she is could be visualized.