Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The mere opposition of the affected persons does not prevent from giving access to the requested information. It is necessary that the opposition founds in specific circumstances that justify the prevalence upward to the data protection about the other rights and implied interests. The fact that, once it has been attempted to give audience to the persons affected with the means within reach who do not imply disproportionate efforts, they have not been able to be contacted does not prevent so that it can usually give access to the requested information. It will be necessary to take the rest of concurrent circumstances into account. The destruction of the information in power of entities in which the Law 10/2001, of 13 July, of archives results from application and document management, it does not depend only on which is the will of the person or affected persons, but it will be necessary to take the forecasts established in this law about documental evaluation into account.

The regulations of data protection of personal character do not block the Regional Government the access of the representatives of the workers to the identity of the persons who occupy or have occupied a job during a period of time concrete, and at the duration of the nominations. Regarding the access to the nominal relation of the persons who are part of the employment exchanges and have not been selected for occupying a concrete job, the regulations of data protection should lead seudonimitzada, assigning each working person a code that does not allow to manage to identify it, to facilitating this information of way. As for the information related to the number of persons who are working at present to the Regional Government without being part of any employment exchange he activates, in the place where they work and at the duration of the nominations, since the applicant does not ask for its identification, there is not obstacle on facilitating this information so that the affected persons cannot be identified.

When the legislation of transparency foresees the duty to publish information to the portal of transparency or the web corporative (subsidies and public helps, authorization of accountings, formation of workers, retributiva information, administrative concessions, among others), the regulations of data protection do not prevent the publication of personal information, although it is necessary to avoid the publication of unnecessary information. When the publication derives from other rules with rank of law, he will have to be to the terms that this legislation establishes, without harm which it is necessary to respect what derives from the LOPD. The advertising of information related to "any matter of public interest (...)" (art. 8.1.m) LTC), he does not authorize to publish particulars related with this, without consent or without specific legal habilitation, and therefore in principle it will be necessary to anonymize or to dissociate the particulars.

The regulations of data protection of personal character do not block the access of the representatives of the workers of the union section of (...) to the identity of the persons nominated as geriatric assistants to the Regional Government, to the fact of whether these were part or not of the employment exchange and at the duration of the nominations.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access of a town councilor to the justificatory documentation of the transfer carried out to the adjudicator of a contract included in the budgetary game 22799 of the municipal budget, without harm of omitting the identificatives data (number of DNI, number of membership in the Social Security, signature, telephone, address or others) that they would not be necessary to attain the function of control of the town councilor.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access (and copy) of the town councilor to the justificatory economic documentation of the subsidies for the promotion of the sport practice conceded to four sport entities by the Town Council, without harm that, if it is proper, it is necessary to omit the information deserving of special protection that can be evident there or those data that are unnecessary for the supposed purpose of control and taxation of the subsidized municipal activity.

The applicable regulations, and the principles of quality, of minimization, and of purpose taking, the communication of the information requested by the town councilor, into account related in "all properties that are not houses through listings anonymized with the data of cadastral value, type of applied IBI and amount to pay data base or editable spreadsheet in format", it is not contrary to the regulations of protection of particulars. The possibility, in concrete suppositions, of the posterior communication of specific information related to determinate properties or to determinate persons (tributary obligatory ones) cannot be discarded, if this is justified for the fulfillment of the functions of the town councilor.

With respect to claim 506/2016, the regulations of protection of particulars it does not prevent to give to the complaining person the copies of the documents related with the reports of planning permission and construction that they are necessary for the purpose of control of the urbanistic legality in the same terms than those that exposed themselves in the reports (IAI 30/2016 and 31/2016). With respect to the rest of claims, there is inconvenience neither on giving the person claiming the copies of the reports of licenses, without harm of omitting with previous character, the identificatives data of the applicants or headlines of the licenses that are not the name and surnames (DNI, telephone, address, etc.). There is not inconvenience either in that the claimant can take photographs with the mobile device of the mentioned documents, once the unnecessary particulars omitted.

Given that the article 40.1.c) of the EBEP fits out the communication to the representatives of the workers of the data related to the civil servants sanctioned by very severe faults, from the prospect of the regulations of data protection of personal character there is not obstacle to carry out this communication, indicating the name and the surnames of the sanctioned person and the imposed sanction.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access to the report of the selection process of the temporary work staff of a Park of Christmas that he requests the town councilor, whenever formality of audience has been given to the affected persons and no personal circumstance that can mean a limitation of the access results from it. This, without harm that it would be necessary to omit the access to the data about the candidates who for its nature require a special protection (article 7 LOPD), the ones related to the commission of penal offenses, as well as other data (number of DNI, number of membership in the Social Security, signature, telephone, address or others) that would not be necessary to attain the function of control of the town councilor.