Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

With regard to the request for access to information on the list of workers, from 1 January 2020 until the present, by years, indicating names and surnames, workplace and equipment where the activity is carried out, number of morning and afternoon days held in person and at a distance, and whether or not tickets have been paid in restaurants, it is justified only if this information is provided without identification by workplace and equipment where it performs its activity and replacing the name and surnames of workers with a code that does not allow them to be identified.

Data protection regulations do not prevent access to the requested information consisting of the name and surnames of the person who met the head of the Area of Territory of the City Council in the context of a dossier protecting urban planning law, provided that this person has participated as a collegiate technician in the aforementioned dossier. Outside this assumption, access to the requested information should be denied.

The complainant considered that, by publishing the results of the chess competitions, organised by the FCE, the participants' health data were disseminated and preserved whenever, to participate in the competition, the Passaport Covid-19 had to be exhibited. In this respect, information regarding whether a person is vaccinated or has suffered a disease constitutes health data in accordance with Article 4 of the GDPR. However, in this case, the ECF has argued sufficiently that, on the one hand, in order to comply with the legality in force, it should require the display of Passport Covid-19 to competition participants and, on the other hand, that there were people who displayed an antigen test, PCR or vaccination exemption document. In these circumstances, it cannot be claimed that the publication of the aforementioned acts allowed third parties to relate the persons identified to the acts, to the fact that they had been vaccinated against COVID-19, whenever, there were people who might not be vaccinated, and to have presented a PCR or an antigen test, and others who had a vaccination waiver document. For these reasons, the reported facts should be archived.

The City Council stored a common electronic folder, to which all agents and administrative staff of the Local Police could access, a complaint that the complainant filed about the counting of hours of the service days carried out.

Disapproval of the claim of guardianship by right to delete a report and other data from the clinical history on the grounds of the optional person.

The claimant requested the removal of certain records of his clinical history which he considered incorrect. It is necessary to partially estimate the claim, since the entity gave an incomplete response, since it only referred to the deletion of any data that might appear in the clinical history of the applicant, without referring to demonstrations about the alleged falseness/incorrection of these data. The entity is required to request the amendment of the application so that the applicant can provide the proof of the alleged incorrections in the said background.

It is decided to admonise the Department of Justice, Rights and Memory since, as of 02/02/2023, when the Organic Law 7/2021, on the protection of personal data processed in the enforcement of criminal sanctions, was already fully applicable, the Department did not provide the prison population with all the information provided for in art. In this regard, no corrective measures are required since, in the letter of allegations that the Department has submitted to the Authority, it claims to have updated the right of information it provides to the prison population when entering a prison, in accordance with the IT 7/2021. In this regard, the entity has provided a copy of the right of information signed by persons who have entered prison during February and March 2023, and it is noted that these are already adapted to the IT 7/2021.

The publication of the work census of the Col·legi d'Economistes de Catalunya, which included personal data (name, surnames, sex, DNI, seniority and professional category) of 21 people, relating to the electoral process for choosing the person representing the workers of the CEC, is denounced. It is also reported that the publication was made in a space accessible by people outside the CEC staff. It is archived because the processing has a legal basis and because it has not been proven that the census had been published in a place accessible to third parties.

The complainant complained that, within the framework of the processing of a request for access to public information, the GAIP would have revealed to third parties affected by the access, their identity without the latter having requested it. However, in the pre-information phase initiated by this Authority, the complained entity has stated that, one of the persons affected by the access asked to know who was requesting controversial information. In this regard, in accordance with Article 62 RLTC, the GAIP considered, after consulting the applicant, that the submission of the application with its identity could be essential for the defense of the rights and interests held by the third party concerned. That being so, it should be noted that, consulted by the GAIP, the person here denouncing consented to the revelation of his identity. According to the above, therefore, the reported treatment was left open by Article 6.1(a) and c), in connection with the LLT and the LTTE, which is why the present actions are being closed.

The complaint is shelved because there is no rational indication of the reported facts. The complainant complained that the City Council would have disclosed its data to third parties, in relation to municipal charges.