The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
41 results were found for your search terms Legal obligation
Possibility of a professional association being an authorized consultant of the Official Register of Sports Professionals of Catalonia
CNS 13/2022
The access of the professional association to the information of the official Register of Sports Professionals of Catalonia on whether a certain sports professional is registered in it can be based on the legal basis of article 6.1.c) of the RGPD, in connection with the provisions of the transparency legislation. However, access to the professional association for the control of the professional intrusion of a person who is not a member of that association would not be justified by this legal basis.
02/06/2022
The right of access to the documentation of the administrative file by the interested party.
IP 35/2021
File resolution is dictated. There is a neighborhood conflict between two colindant properties which results in an administrative procedure with cross-instances. The two sides repeat the documentation presented by the other side. In this context, the city council facilitates the writing of inheritance facilitated by the here denouncing, the other party on the basis of Articles 4 and 53 LPAC, as a legitimate interested party with the right of access to the documentation of the file.
17/05/2022
Remission of police information to a judge by allegedly incompetent person.
IP 73bis/2021
A Chief of a Police Basic Area responded to a request made by a judge (on whether a City Council requested the SIP user leave of the person complaining), when according to the person denouncing who should have responded is the head of the DSIP. The complaint is filed because it cannot be ruled out that it was the judge himself who requested the information to the head of the aforementioned ABP, either because it was his police reference for the Generalitat Police in the municipality to which the judicial body belonged, or because the City Council - subject to the consultation made by the Court - belonged to that ABP. On the other hand, if the head of the ABP had access to the information requested by the Court, he would be legitimized for communicating it to the court. Nor can it be ruled out that the head of the DSIP had authorized it.
20/04/2022
Unencrypted email DSIP and incompetent person, request hearings on improper access to SIP.
IP 73/2021
It was reported that a chief of the Urban Guard of a City Council, (1) had sent an unencrypted email to the head of the unit in charge of managing the Police Information Systems (SIP) requesting that the person complaining be unpaid as a user of the SIP, in contravention of the SIP Security Manual. He also denounced (2) that the City Council had requested audits of access to the SIP made by the complainant, without legal cause and to a person who was not responsible. The complaint is filed for the following reasons: (1) it is not known that the mail was sent unencrypted (and in any case the facts would be prescribed), and the sending of the mail to the security chief would be covered by the fulfilment of the functions entrusted to the head of the PL; (2) As regards the requests for audit, they are not specific to which requests it refers, there is no record of them being sent to the incompetent person, nor the rule that would have been contravened. In any case, the complainant already filed a complaint with the Authority, concerning the application of an audit application for alleged misuse of the SIP, and the Authority filed the complaint on the grounds that the audit request was legitimate.
20/04/2022
Communication of information between Administrations to minimize the negative impact on people at risk of social exclusion due to the launch of housing
CNS 56/2021
The data processing referred to in the proposed protocol under examination shall comply with the data protection regulations, without prejudice to the considerations made in this opinion and those which it may carry out, as the competent control authority for the processing of data. jurisdictional, the CGPJ. However, it is necessary to revise and modify the consent form of Annex 1 to the Protocol as set out in Section IV of the Opinion.
21/01/2022
- DATA PROTECTION AUTHORITIES
- Catalan Data Protection Authority
- Scope of action
- TRANSFER OR DISCLOSURE OF DATA
- Public administration
- Autonomous community administration
- Law enforcement authorities
- Judges and courts
- PRINCIPLES
- Purpose limitation principle
- Lawfulness principle
- Consent
- In the public interest or in the exercise of official authority
- Legal obligation
Communication of information related to training activities
CNS 54/2021
The communication of information on the trainers to impart the formative action to companies and organizing entities, limited to the identifying data, of contact and of training or experience, would be lawful and would adjust to the principle of minimization of data, to be necessary both for the execution of the contract and for the fulfillment of legal obligations. In addition, the competent authorities may require the information related to the training action necessary to control the execution and application of the bonus by the companies. With the information available, it does not seem justified to communicate information relating to the data relating to the user and password for access to the virtual classroom assigned to students in the training activity, nor those relating to the professional situation of the training staff or responsible for the activity.
18/01/2022
Possibility to publish the telephones and the addresses of electronic mail in the web of the Department
CNS 36/2021
The telephone number and e-mail address, as long as it can be directly or indirectly associated with an individual, are personal data whose processing must comply with the principles and guarantees of data protection regulations. The publication of data relating to the name of the establishment, the industrial address of the establishment, telephone number, e-mail address, website, direct link to the location on the map and geographical location coordinates of the companies registered in the RIAAC, may based on the consent of those affected. The dissemination of this data may also be based on the provisions of Articles 19.3 LOPDGDD and 6.4 RGPD, provided that the persons concerned are offered the possibility of requesting the exclusion of their company from the dissemination.
06/09/2021
- SECTORIAL AREA
- Agriculture
- TRANSFER OR DISCLOSURE OF DATA
- Public administration
- Autonomous community administration
- PERSONAL DATA
- Anonymised data
- Identification data
- Pseudonomized data
- Data of the representative of a legal entity
- ENTITIES
- Public administration
- Autonomous community administration
- PRINCIPLES
- Accurate principle
- Lawfulness principle
- Consent
- Legitimate interest
- In the public interest or in the exercise of official authority
- Legal obligation
- Data minimization principle
Data processing of the vaccine status of Covid 19 of users of a center that organizes group therapeutic activities
CNS 38/2021
In order to be able to process the data relating to the vaccine status of Covid19 of the users of the center for the organization of group therapeutic activities on the basis of articles 6.1.c) and 9.2.i) of the RGPD, it would be necessary that the competent public health authorities establish a decision to this effect, which is not stated on the date of issue of this opinion.
06/08/2021
IP 247/2020
Communications of data within the framework of the procedure of a request of intervention for work, and of a reserved information.
The complaint|denunciation is filed by lack of|due to lack of test|proof of the denounced facts, since only has ascertained that the documentation that the General Direction of Public Function remitted in the General Secretary's Office of the affected Department, and to the instructor persons of the reserved information, is protected by the applicable Protocol, and the communications of data derived from the deliveries|remittances of documentation made are protected for the foreseen juridical bases in the article|item 6.1.c) and e) of the RGPD.
01/07/2021
The expedition of the steering wheel without the consent of the affected person justifies herself in the fact that the treatment was necessary to the attributed to the Town Council and that this had delegated in the .
IP 71/2021
The Town Council had delegated the competences|competitions of management|formality and collection|takings of a municipal tax in the ORGT.
The accusing person lodged a resource|appeal of replacement|repeat against the liquidation of the tax.
The ORGT asked the Town Council for the expedition of the padronal steering wheel of the accusing person, which it|he|she had as a purpose to check out if the requirements were fulfilled that gave the right to the exemption of the tax for transmission of the house|housing within the framework of a resource|appeal of replacement|repeat shown|presented by the accusing person. The juridical basis that legitimates this activity of treatment is not the consent of the affected person, but the treatment is necessary to exercise|exert the competences|competitions attributed to the Town Council and that he|she has delegated in the ORGT.
Later, the accusing person lodged an administrative contentious resource|appeal against the resolution of the ORGT and within the framework of the judicial procedure the administrative report was brought that contained the padronal steering wheel. The juridical basis that protects this treatment is that the treatment is necessary to fulfill a legal duty applicable to the responsible for the treatment.
21/06/2021
Total number of pages: 5