Result of the resolution: Set aside/dismissed
It was reported that a chief of the Urban Guard of a City Council, (1) had sent an unencrypted email to the head of the unit in charge of managing the Police Information Systems (SIP) requesting that the person complaining be unpaid as a user of the SIP, in contravention of the SIP Security Manual. He also denounced (2) that the City Council had requested audits of access to the SIP made by the complainant, without legal cause and to a person who was not responsible. The complaint is filed for the following reasons: (1) it is not known that the mail was sent unencrypted (and in any case the facts would be prescribed), and the sending of the mail to the security chief would be covered by the fulfilment of the functions entrusted to the head of the PL; (2) As regards the requests for audit, they are not specific to which requests it refers, there is no record of them being sent to the incompetent person, nor the rule that would have been contravened. In any case, the complainant already filed a complaint with the Authority, concerning the application of an audit application for alleged misuse of the SIP, and the Authority filed the complaint on the grounds that the audit request was legitimate.