Remission of police information to a judge by allegedly incompetent person.

A Chief of a Police Basic Area responded to a request made by a judge (on whether a City Council requested the SIP user leave of the person complaining), when according to the person denouncing who should have responded is the head of the DSIP. The complaint is filed because it cannot be ruled out that it was the judge himself who requested the information to the head of the aforementioned ABP, either because it was his police reference for the Generalitat Police in the municipality to which the judicial body belonged, or because the City Council - subject to the consultation made by the Court - belonged to that ABP. On the other hand, if the head of the ABP had access to the information requested by the Court, he would be legitimized for communicating it to the court. Nor can it be ruled out that the head of the DSIP had authorized it.