Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The reported entity sent the unpaid invoices by the leaseholder of a property owned by the complainant, to the complainant since this was the owner of the contracted policy for the supply of water and, therefore, the one obliged to pay the invoices. In this case, regardless of what the parties stipulated in the rental contract, the person who owned the property was obliged to pay before AGISSA. In this regard, it is worth saying that, later, the complainant changed the ownership of the policy in favor of a third person who leased his property and, when he left the property, he asked for the billing to be returned to his name. In this second case, the complainant also asked AGISSA to know the outstanding debt of the tenant since the transfer of rights and obligations of the aforementioned policy could only be carried out if the complainant assumed the amounts not satisfied. Likewise, he also alleged that he needed to know the outstanding amounts in order to be able to claim them judicially to the leased person of his property, to breach the clauses of the rental contract. In accordance with the above, the Authority considered that the sending of said information was protected by Article 6.1 f) RGPD since it was carried out to satisfy the legitimate interests of the complainant. Specifically, to satisfy the legitimate interest of the complainant to obtain the necessary evidence, to claim to the tenant of the property the amounts that he did not satisfy.

In this case, for the information available, access by the applicant to a copy of the users' register of the drinking water supply service in a town planning, supply contracts and receipts liquidated between May 2022 and February 2023 cannot be considered as justified, nor can it be considered to be the personal data that may appear in the accounting register system established during the replacement in the provision of this service. However, there would be no problem, if necessary, in providing him with economic information, broken down and aggregated on the cost arising from the provision of the service, in the terms indicated in the opinion.

The right to information of the users of the entity, due to lack of documentary accreditation at the time of collection (Articles 12, 13, and 14 GDPR); and due to violation of the principle of application, due to the improper use of the data, which consists of subjective and negative comments on a group of members who wish to submit their candidature.

Aigües de Barcelona issued a total of 12 invoices and corresponding direct debit receipts with incorrect personal data. In particular, he assigned names and surnames of 5 different users to the DNI of the person complaining. For this reason, bank receipts were sent to the account of the person denouncing the names and surnames of persons other than the accountholder.

The city council can access the information available to the concessionaire of the water supply relating to homes for which there is no water consumption in the last 2 years or when this consumption is abnormally low, in order to 'apply the surcharge to the IBI provided for in the TRLRHL with respect to these homes.

The complaint|denunciation with respect to the duty of information is filed because a breach is not observed, aside that the eventual offense for not having informed in a previous and specific way about the cession of data in the Town Council, it|she would be prescribed. 2. The complaint|denunciation for the cession of data of the ACA in the Town Council is filed because it is considered that such communication was protected by article|item 21 LOPD, that it|he|she was the applicable rule for temporary reasons.

With the information of which it is ordered, and for application of the principle of minimization the transmission in the Town Council of the detail of work information of the workers/nothing of the adjudicator company contained to the Instructions regulatory of the procedure of control of the concession of water supply, should be facilitated of anonymized way or pseudonymized. For the purpose of control of the quality of the service, it does not seem that in this case the identification of the affected workers/nothing is necessary/from.

In cases of supplantation of identity, the archive is appropriate when the denounced entity performs with the diligence that is exigible for him.

the claim for formal motives is loved, since the Town Council, as a responsible for the file and of the treatment, was forced to to give answer to the request of access and to prove it in the face of the Authority, and the silence of the Town Council has not allowed to clarify if in the concrete case he had ordered the resolution to the lender entity of the service and person in charge of the treatment. As for the background the claim is also loved, since the proportionate information in a clearly extemporaneous way for the person in charge to the person who formulated the request of access is clearly insufficient.