Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

Given the configuration of the right of opposition (art. 21 RGPD), it is not essential that the center addresses the minor to ask him to specify or justify his request, for the purposes of making a decision on the exercise of this right. This is without prejudice to the fact that, although not mandatory, the center may request additional information from the minor. With the information available, in a case such as the one raised, the existence of compelling legitimate reasons, specified in the rights and obligations of the holders of parental authority and in the repercussions that this may have on the provision of adequate assistance, always for the benefit of the child, it may justify maintaining the mother's access to medical history data.

The police Police it can obtain data of health of a person, the number of the room included in the one that is entered, without its their consent when they act exercising exerting functions of judicial policeman within the framework of a research it only specifies. In case the request of the Police is not clear enough to in the effects from determining the fulfillment compliment of the requirements established in article item 22.3 LOPD, the sanitary center can request a clarification.

In accordance with the regulations of data protection personal, it is not justified to give access to the information requested so that it allows to identify the affected persons. Information aggregated, so that it does not allow to identify the affected persons, as the Town Council has made can be given.

The FFCCS may obtain a copy of the statement of injuries, including injuries linked to situations of gender-based violence or assault on minors, without the consent of the data owner, when acting as a judicial police officer for a specific investigation. The delivery to FFCCS agents of the statement of injuries in sealed and sealed envelopes when the interested party cannot take care of them may be a procedure appropriate to the data protection regulations as long as their purpose is only to deposit them until at the time when the person concerned can take charge of it. This is without prejudice to other practices such as indicating to the affected person that they may obtain a copy of the statement by accessing their medical history.

Access to the images captured by the video surveillance system in relation to an accident at work by members of the Health and Safety Committee could be justified in certain cases, although, given the circumstances of the case analyzed, they should be facilitated. anonymized by being able to achieve in this way the purpose pursued. The person responsible for investigating the accident, however, could access it so that those affected are identifiable.

The notification of the diligence|proceeding of embargo|distraint to the lessee, once the embargo|distraint of the credits that this has to pay has been stated the hirer (tributary debtor) is lawful in accordance with the tributary legislation and he|she|it founds in the fulfillment|compliment of a mission in public interest or the exercise of public powers.

Personal data can be communicated on the phone whenever appropriate measures are taken to confirm the identity of the person in question, which did not impinge on the person reporting in his letter of complaint. The principle of the presumption of innocence applies when the complained entity denies being aware of the call in question in which data of the person denouncing his daughter has been revealed.

The City Council practiced notifications to citizens of the municipality without applying any protective measures that would prevent access to the contents of the document to notify, so that the notifier agent could access the full content of the notification. Also, to accredit the practice of the notification provided the notifier agent with a copy of the document to notify that the recipient had to sign.

The information referring to the identity of the user persons who have accessed the clinical history, is not part of the right of foreseen access to the article|item 15 of the RGPD.

The publication of the minutes of the Local Executive Council, in what he|she|it identified by error the to present that a contentious resource|appeal had interposed clerk against the Town Council, it|he|she harms the principle|beginning of confidentiality.