The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
3,654 results were found
IP 291/2021
File resolution dictated. The whistleblower argues that the SCT uses an obsolete and unauthorized postal address. There is no violation since that address was the one recorded in the DGT database and in accordance with traffic regulations, the obligation to update the address rests with the complainant himself. The STC, on the other hand, acted appropriately because, in accordance with the rules, it first consulted the registration of the DGT and, as the notification proved unsuccessful, it turned to the data on the Padrón.
14/06/2022
PS 8/2022
During an entire school year, the IAS sent a student's communications and notes to an email that was not that of the pupil's parents, but to a third IAS family, which led to violation of the principle of confidentiality.
14/06/2022
IP 335/2020
It is declared inadmissible, since such a complaint cannot be admitted, as one of the necessary requirements for its admission does not exist, such as that the person presenting a complaint has identified and signed it (Apdcat and LPAC). In any case, it is clear from the documentation accompanying the complaint that no breach of the data protection rules is inferred from the reported facts.
14/06/2022
PT 7/2022
Partial estimate. The claimant has the right to have the person responsible for the treatment supply a copy of the files requested in the format he had requested, in this case, in electronic format.
14/06/2022
IP 230/2021
The reported entity has reported that the data would be published on a website whose ownership belongs to a third person, outside the College. He has also stated that the published archive would have been made public since the College in 2016, and that it has not been accessible since that year. According to the above, the Inspectorate verified that the document was not published on the College's website and while the document would contain personal data, certainly excessive, the procedure should be filed as the alleged breach of the personal data protection regulations has already been prescribed.
14/06/2022
PD 4/2022
10/06/2022
PT 148/2021
Estimates of the right of access to emails or other documents containing personal data of the claimant or his representative (son), because the request contained in the submitted request would be considered to fit within the framework of an art right request.
07/06/2022
PT 155/2021
The answer provided by the ICS is declared to be extemporaneous, by which the request for rectification made by the person claiming not to have responded within the time frame set in the applicable law is dismissed. The claim of the claimant as regards the correction of the annotation in his or her clinical course in relation to the medical visit of date 05/03/2019 is dismissed, since the requested rectification is not appropriate; and the claim as regards the rectification of his or her clinical course in relation to the visit of 26/01/2021 is estimated.
07/06/2022
PT 36/2022
The claimant asks for the deletion of the 'common address' data, but the Education Department denies the deletion of this data. The Authority does not consider it appropriate to delete the 'common asylum' data because it considers that its treatment is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation applicable to the Department of Education, in accordance with the rules of public function and to practice certain notifications in that address, so that the assumption described in Article 17.3.b of the GPD does not apply when the treatment is required to comply with a legal obligation requiring the processing of data imposed by the law of the Union or of the Member States to which the person responsible is subject, or to perform a mission performed in the public interest or in the exercise of public powers conferred on the person responsible is applicable.
07/06/2022
PT 23/2022
The claimant has not submitted the documentation relating to medical health, nor has he submitted allegations arguing for any circumstances that would prevent the submission of such documentation to the Authority. In this respect, health legislation lays down the time limits for the conservation of integrated documentation in the patient's clinical history, in 5 or 15 years, depending on the type of document in question, without providing for its suppression, when the medical high is not available, which is why the claimant's request is not appropriate.
07/06/2022
Total number of pages: 366