Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

It is not necessary the creation and inscription of the file with respect to the treatments of images through cameras carried out by the forces and security corps. The archive proceeds when the images do not use themselves in order to work control denounced; when cash is made the law of information; and when is the period of conservation not superior to the one foreseen by the specific regulations.

Applied articles: 8, 9 and 11 Instruction of 1 o'clock/2009; 1, 2, 4 and 7 of the Decree 78/2010.

The archive of the opened IP is appropriate for to investigate if the file that gave coverage to the treatment of some data had been created, when it is ascertained that the file was created and figures inscribed in the Register of Data Protection of Catalonia.

The claim is loved referring to the law|right of cancellation shown|presented by the lack of answer of the Town Council, since the attempt at notification of the resolution dictated by the Town Council was produced beyond the deadline|installment of 10 days, of which the claimant did not have knowledge when it|he|she formulated the claim in the face of the Authority.

Applied articles|items: 16 LOPD, 32 RLOPD and LPAC.

The claim is rejected because the responsible organ made the law of access in the specified period effective to the effect, since several attempts at notification duly proved, made in the established deadline, are evident.

Applied articles: 4.5, 15 LOPD and 29 RLOPD.

Once the text of the object Agreement of consultation has been examined, it is considered that this adapts to the regulations of data protection if the considerations made in this judgement are taken into account.

Following the basis that the RLT is public, and taking the legislation of transparency into account, the regulations of data protection do not prevent from communicating the representatives of the workers the contents typical of the RLT, nor the descriptive cards of the jobs of the Town Council, nor the relation of the jobs that are vacant. The regulations of data protection personal it does not prevent to communicate another information requested, among others, about the person who covers each job, the type of contract, or a relation of the extra times carried out and classified by services. The communication of the information contained in the document TC-2 (and in the document TC-1, if it represents the square corresponding to the “abbreviated TC-2” filled), can only be carried out if the consent of the affected persons is had (art. 23 LTC).

Regarding the information contained in the minutes of the court, the regulations of protection of particulars it does not prevent to give access to the representative of the workers to the related information to the appraisal of the court in relation to the candidates persons who have been chosen to be part of the employment exchange, and to the punctuation conceded to the selected candidates. This, without harm that, except the that the terms of the call have been set forth with respect to the possibility to know the condition of disability given, if the minutes of the qualifier court incorporate data of health or others that can develop especially considerate information protected (art. 23 LTC, art. 7 LOPD and art. 9 RGPD), the access to these will have to be denied, unless the consent of the affected persons is had.

The fulfillment of the principle of quality of the data (article 4 LOPD) it requires to make a ponderation with respect to the particulars included in the whole of the requested information, especially if sensitive data are treated (article 7 LOPD), so that more data of the strictly necessary ones to attain the legitimate purpose that justifies the access are not communicated, this is the development of the functions that correspond to the town councilors. Facilitating to the town councilors the access to all the annotations made in the Register of documents entry of the Town Council in the terms that the consultation brings up he could force the principle of quality and to mean a risk for the correct protection of the particulars of the affected persons.

The request of a citizen of the identificatives data (name and surname or DNI) of the statutory staff, to the effects of making them figure in an acusament of reception, it would be legitimate, in attention to the forecasts of the Law 55/2003 and of Law 39/2015, in so far as it would have as a purpose to know the identity of the person who has attended to it in its performance.