The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
188 results were found for your search terms Clinical record
Right of suppression.
PT 20/2023
The claimant requested the removal of certain records of his clinical history which he considered incorrect. It is necessary to partially estimate the claim, since the entity gave an incomplete response, since it only referred to the deletion of any data that might appear in the clinical history of the applicant, without referring to demonstrations about the alleged falseness/incorrection of these data. The entity is required to request the amendment of the application so that the applicant can provide the proof of the alleged incorrections in the said background.
11/04/2023
Access to the clinical course.
PT 106/2022
The complaining party initiated the present rights protection procedure before this Authority as it considered that the requested entity gave it the requested information (clinical course of visits of 12.09.22 and 21.09.22) in a manipulated manner. In this regard, it demanded access to the original annotations made by doctors doctors to the clinical course of the two reference visits. Well, in consultation with this Authority, the Hospital Clinico has stated that the information it gave to the complainant, in response to his request, is the original version of the notes that doctors made in the clinical course, and that this documentation has not been manipulated or modified. In this regard, the content of the Hospital's response was transferred to the requesting party, so that it would submit the allegations or evidence it considered relevant, warning it that, if within 10 days it did not submit any writings, it would be understood that the Hospital had fully complied with its application for access. After this period, the complaining party has argued nothing against considering their right of access satisfied, which is why it should be concluded that the information that the Hospital gave to the complainant, in response to his request, was all that was in their power. That being the case, it is appropriate to reject the complaint, because the entity gave a full response within the legally envisaged deadline, to the specific terms of the application.
16/03/2023
Resolution archiving of a complaint for improper access to HC3 of the complainant by personnel of the mutual EGARSAT.
IP 472/2022
Undue access to the HC3 of the complainant is not credited. The filing of the complaint is resolved because the complainant has accredited that the data referring to the complainant's HC3 was extracted from an opinion submitted to them by the INS.
02/03/2023
Denying information about accesses to clinical history
IAI 3/2023
Data protection regulations do not prevent the person from notifying the data they request, regarding access to their clinical history, including the identity of the professionals who have accessed it, in relation to the requested period.
24/02/2023
Undue access to HC3.
PS 91/2022
There are four unjustifiable accesses to the HC3 of the person denouncing by staff of the Sanitary Corporation Parc Taulí de Sabadell. It resolves to admonish the Corporation as the person responsible for an infringement provided for in Article 83.5.a) in relation to Article 5.1.a), both of which are in the GDPR, for 2 undue access to the HC3 which have not been prescribed, for the violation of the basic principles for processing, specifically the principle of application.
22/02/2023
Access to clinical history for statistical purposes.
IP 234/2021
It is decided to archive the present complaint since the access to the clinical history of the complainant was made from a Primary Care Center, by a professional who had assigned administrative and statistical management tasks, within the framework of the National Statistical Plan (2021-2024). In this respect, it should be concluded that the aforementioned access is covered by Article 6.1e) GDPR on the exercise of public powers, in accordance with Law 12/1989 of 9 May, on the Public Statistical Function.
14/02/2023
Undue access to HC3.
PS 85/2022
The person complained that he had unduly accessed his clinical history. The ICS recognises this and states that it has taken steps to prevent any further undue access. A final resolution is issued, implying a violation of the principle of confidentiality.
14/02/2023
Request for access to clinical history and its traceability.
PT 68/2022
The claim was partially considered when it was noted, with regard to the traceability application, that there was no need to report on the identity of the natural persons who accessed the HC; and with regard to the copy of the HC, that although the ICS had submitted copy of the clinical course, it was missing to submit a medical report, as well as to inform the complainant that they did not have the other medical documentation cited in the submitted documentation.
07/02/2023
Denied access to clinical history
IAI 2/2023
According to Article 24.3 LTC, the resolution of the application for access to the clinical history of the applicant must be processed in accordance with the GDPR and the possible complaint must be processed before the Catalan Data Protection Authority, the competent authority to find out about the complaints in relation to the right of access provided for in Article 15 GDPR.
31/01/2023
Undue access to clinical history.
PS 71/2022
It resolves to admonish the Catalan Institute of Health for the alleged violation of the principle of confidentiality, since a nursing professional would have accessed the clinical history of the current complainant, without this access being related to any care or related administrative management that justified it.
25/01/2023
Total number of pages: 19