Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The affected person complained because the hospital did not respond to his request for access. It is estimated with respect to the form, because the entity's response was untimely, and is rejected with respect to the merits, since the entity responded to the claimant.

The untimeliness of the response of the General Directorate of Police (DGP) to the cancellation request submitted by the complainant is declared, given that the DGP responded, by means of the corresponding resolution, once exhausted the period of one month provided for in the LOPD. As for the merits, it is stated that the DPG has satisfied the right, as it has upheld the request for access.

The trade union cannot access the report assessing the trial period of the person in the city council who held a job, which sets out the specific reasons why he has not passed this test of the selective process. However, it could be provided with information on the tasks associated with such a job and on the aspects to be evaluated by persons who exercise tutoring for persons who are in trial period or in work placement practices.

The City Council can publish the names and surnames of officials enabled for the identification and authentication of persons and the issuing of authentic copies, by responding to this treatment to compliance with a legal obligation, in consideration of LPAC's forecasts for assistance in the use of electronic means to stakeholders, and the forecasts for active advertising of the LLTC.

The occupational risk prevention regulations provide for the establishment of a temperature control over workers themselves. As regards workers from external companies or users of the entity's services, this control could only be carried out in cases where, in view of the activity carried out in their buildings, some of the sectoral plans approved by the PROCICAT that provide for the adoption of this measure of prevention and health protection are implemented, given that it is not currently known that the authorities responsible for public health have generally established the adoption of the measure of control of body temperature prior to all persons accessing a work place.

Members of Parliament can exercise the right of access to information held by the OAC under the right granted to them by the PRC, either by copying requested documents, or by direct consultation of information in the administrative offices with the assistance of up to two advisers accredited by the General Secretariat of Parliament. Despite the preferential nature of this right, the limits provided for in the regulation regulating the right of access to public information are applicable. Where the information contains data relating to infringements or criminal or administrative sanctions (or other data provided for in Article 23 LTC), access to this information must in principle be limited. Where it is essential to identify the persons concerned, information on the outcome of the procedures processed by the OAC may be provided with respect to the completed procedures, but access to the entire dossier must be avoided. With regard to the rest of the information, it can be given access, although under the principle of minimization it is necessary to exclude data that is unnecessary for the control function carried out by Members, in accordance with what is stated in the V Legal Foundation. The identification of the person who is the originator of his or her actions must be preserved if he or she so declares, either in the complaint or later in the hearing process granted to him or her, unless there is a judicial request.

It would not be in accordance with data protection regulations to provide information on the identity of the members of Parliament who have been assigned security in the last five legislatures, the reason for the assignment and the type of device (police force or private security) established in each case, given that this information can affect both the safety of the people affected and aspects of their private life and even their personal and family privacy.

It is filed in so far as in the sinus of the research carried out no undue access to the clinical history has been proved. The denouncer had manifested its|his|her|their desire to withdraw the complaint|denunciation.

The accusing person complains that the ORGT sends him|her notifications -at its|his|her|their number of mobile|motive- directed to the company in which it|he|she had loaned services and that now it|she was extinguished. It is filed, since the ORGT attended to the request of the accusing person.

Publication to|in the social networks linked to the Town Council, of the data of a minor who, on the occasion of the campaign that had been arranged to pick up material against the COVID-19, had made a donation. Breach of the principle|beginning of confidentiality.