The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
3,654 results were found
The complaining person has the right to access not only to|in the direct information about its|his|her|their person that he|she can order the the entity claimed as a consequence of several complaints against its|his|her|their person, but also to|in the identity of the persons who have formulated the complaint.
11/03/2021
IAI 10/2021
In view of the regulations for the protection of personal data, it would not be justified to provide information on any responsibilities that may have been incurred by people in the service of the entity in relation to the irregularities detected in the economic and accounting management of the entity between 2013 and 2019, but the information should be anonymized. With regard to other agreements that may appear in the minutes, in view of the purpose alleged by the claimant, their relevance is not justified, so access must be denied.
04/03/2021
IP 325/2019
The part of the complaint relating to the treatment of images recorded by video surveillance cameras in the municipality is archived, because when the complainant submitted applications for the right of access (art.15 GDPR) and opposition right (art.21 GDPR) the cameras were not yet working. Nor can the city council be held responsible for the actions of an agent who had archival documents concerning third parties in his digital folder, as it would be to demand an almost impossible degree of diligence to control the contents of all personal folders of agents. Advertisement to the City Council (Art.58.2.a GDPR) and is required to remove undue documentation, and it is proposed to initiate disciplinary actions (Art.77.3 LOPDGDD).
04/03/2021
The requested rectification is rejected. The complaining person asked for the rectification of a datum that figured in a report issued by the SSB of the Town Council, of derivation from the case of the minor daughter of the claimant in the EAIA. In particular, the complaining person asked that it were not evident there -as incorrect, in his/her/their opinion- the school absenteeism of the minor, like one of the motives who caused the quoted derivation from the case. The claim is rejected since it is considered that the datum of school absenteeism, in the date of emission|broadcast of the report, was exact and it|he|she fitted to the reality of the facts.
04/03/2021
49/2020
The General Direction of Attention to|in the Family and the Educational Community, of the Department of Education is accused, of an offense for breach of the principle|beginning of limitation of the deadline|installment of conservation (art. 5.1.e and 83.5.a RGPD, art. 72.1.a LOPDGDD), for having kept these listings published in internet, even though the purpose had already been accomplished that its|his|her|their publication justified (to inform of the day, the hour and the classroom of realization of the test|proof of level). The initial imputation of a second offense, related to the breach of the principle|beginning of minimization of the data, is not maintained.
04/03/2021
The claim for formal motives is loved, since the DGP did not give answer in the deadline|installment of ten days legally established (LOPD). As for the background|bottom, it is stated|declared that the DPG has satisfied the law|right, although this pronouncement is conditioned the DGP to facilitate (or it|he|she proves to have facilitated) to the person claiming copy of the estimatòria resolution of its|his|her|their request of cancellation of particulars, and in this same deadline|installment it|he|she gives an account to|in the Authority of having made it.
04/03/2021
52/2020
The CSMA (concerted center) harmed the principle|beginning of confidentiality when in a request of analytics a form that included the mention "mental health" used, datum that under no circumstances was necessary to practice the analytics.
04/03/2021
PS 48/2020
The City Council notified a resolution listing the name and surnames, the number of c/c and the amount to be returned, both to the person concerned and to the other people who for various reasons were unable to perform the activity to which they had enrolled. Vulneration of the principle of confidentiality (Art.5.1.f GDPR).
04/03/2021
66/2020
The principle|beginning of legality harms the publication of the you decree of the mayor's office with particulars corresponding to the years 2018, 2019 and 2020, without a juridical basis that protects it.
04/03/2021
IAI 11/2021
In view of the regulations of data protection personal, it would not be justified to give the information to which it is intended to access in so far as it can work out highly invasive of the privacy of the persons affected and that can be evident there information related to the eventual responsibilities which persons in the service of the entity in relation to the detected irregularities have been able to commit in the economic and countable management of the entity between years 2013 and 2019, but it would be necessary to anonymize the information. However, yes that it would be possible to facilitate aggregated information, so that the number of suspicious persons does not allow to identify the persons affected, about whether there have been expenses that are considered irregular, of having made use presumedly irregular of the credit cards and if one of them is not linked occupationally to the company, the categorization of the expenses that have originated the suspicions of the commission of irregularities without facilitating the detail, as well as the actions adopted by the company to require responsibilities.
04/03/2021
Total number of pages: 366