Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

It is proper to reject the rectification of the date of high in the social security, since this date does not correspond with the date of the nomination, but with the date of the taking over.

A municipal institute|high school of exchequer is admonished as a responsible for an offense related to the breach of the principle|beginning of accuracy, for having associated incorrectly the NIF of the denouncer to a third person, against whom the institute|high school initiated a sanctionative procedure on the subject of traffic.

The answer is declared extemporaneous, since the company responsible for the treatment did not respond to the claimant within the legally established time limit, without any further pronouncements or requirements regarding the substance of the claim, since the right of the claimant to delete the data from the file where the data of the municipal swimming pool users is recorded has been made effective.

In the publication of certificates of the agreements of the School Council, the person was identified by denouncing through his name and surnames, along with the meaning of his vote, without his consent for such publication.

Extemporaneous. The health centre responded, after term, to the claimant, estimating his request to delete HC from information not linked to his person; deletion is considered in accordance with data protection regulations.

The complaint against the City Council is archived because the personal data of the complainant listed in a local government board agreement, which was disseminated through whatsapp among the municipality's neighbours, is information that the City Council was obliged to publish by the principle of transparency (Art. 9.1.e LTC).

In giving transfer to the entity claimed of the claim, this informed of it having had knowledge that a judicial sentence had withdrawn the claimant -who had exercised|exerted the right of access to the clinical history of its|his|her|their minor daughter in representation of this- the exercise of the parental authority. In front of this information, a writing to the claimant -through its|his|her|their representative- was sent to him|her so that it|he|she confirmed or denied this extreme|end, which it|he|she did not make since the electronic notifications that were sent to him|her were refused.
It proceeds to reject the claim formulated, in so far as the claimant could not perform in legal representation of its|his|her|their minor daughter on not being able to exercise|exert the parental authority, and, consequently, the claimed entity could not provide it|him|her the access to the HC of of its|his|her|their daughter given the very personal character of the law|right of access.

Data protection regulations do not prevent access to the data provided for in Article 24.1 LTC and 70.2 RLTC, nor access to information relating to legal persons. It does not seem justified to achieve the purpose of transparency access to data of ticket buyers, without prejudice to the information being provided with the prior anonymization of the data. On the other hand, access to the identity of the natural persons receiving invitations or tickets given away would be justified for transparency purposes, unless the hearing procedure results in specific circumstances that justify the limitation or that they are people who form part of vulnerable groups.

The right of the claimant to access (and obtain copy) the information requested on the basis of Articles 15 of the GDPR and 24 of the LTC must be recognised, without prejudice to the elimination or concealment of the information that may be recorded about the other workers investigated by the events of the year 2013 to which the application refers.

In the absence of another legal basis to enable treatment, the presence of a representative of an association in a citizen’s interview with social services requires their consent. To the extent that it may involve the processing of special categories of data, it must be explicit. In any case, it is necessary to inform the citizen in advance about the aspects provided for in article 13 of the RGPD, especially with regard to the communication or disclosure of the citizen's personal data to the companion, due to being present at the interview.