Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The regulations of data protection, in connection with the applicable regulations (LSS, Law 5/2008 and LDOIA), it allows that the responsible Entity does not cancel, that is, that it does not block nor suppresses, at least, during a certain time, those data of the affected one and of its daughter that are necessary for the correct fulfillment of its functions. This, without harm of limiting the access to the specially sensitive information or afectadora for the privacy or the security of the affected ones, which cannot be canceled. Regarding the particulars of the affected one and its daughter that yes they can be canceled, they will have to block up and, if it is proper, to suppress.

The access of a company of travellers transports to the identity of the object person of a sanctionative procedure in course for driving of a vehicle in engine under the effects of the drugs could only be produced of considering itself that this shows the condition of interested in the procedure. In case the procedure had finished, the access could only concede itself previous express consent of the affected one or existence of another rule with rank of law that protected it, for application of the article 15.1 of the Law 19/2013.

The publication of the resolution of socioeconomic helps concession (canteen scholarships) in the board of advertisements of the teaching institutions in substitution of its notification to the persons concerned it would entail, in attention to the collective affected (minors) and to the nature of the public help (situations of social vulnerability), an affectation to its right to the protection of particulars, among other rights, for which it would be necessary to apply the foreseen mechanism to the article 61 of the LRJPAC, in such a way that the identity was preserved from the beneficiaries.

The ascribed staff to the center penitentiary he has to identify through the NIP or FULL when they correlate with the imprisoned population, with other citizens or they intervene in a procedure judicial, all this in the exercise of its functions. Applied articles: Order JUS/177/2004; 137 LRJPAC

The access to the clinical history on part a sanitary professional, without consent of the affected person and without a welfare reason justifying it, a breach of the principle of confidentiality of the particulars means. Applied articles: 10, 44.3.d) LOPD

The 2 claims of access accumulated since they did not attend to themselves in deadline are loved, and also from an optics in the background since the given answer for the responsible for the treatment did not fit to the LOPD, motive for which is required it to to give answer taking into account the considerations made about the possible interest superior of the minor (son of the here complaining). Applied articles: Art. 30.2 RLOPD, 10.d) Law 12/2007, 11.2.d) HIM 1/1996, 5.2, 7.3 and 17 Law 14/2010, 236-18.2.c) CCCat

The catchment and recording of the voice it is legitimate when the purpose of surveillance cannot be achieved through the recording exclusive to the image and when is proportionate. The informative posters have to include the pictogram that reflects the catchment of the voice, if it falls. Applied articles: 4 LOPD; 7, 10 and 12 Instruction 1/2009; 137 LRJPAC

The 2 claims of access accumulated since they did not attend to themselves in deadline are loved, and also from an optics in the background since the given answer for the responsible for the treatment did not fit to the LOPD, motive for which is required it to to give answer taking into account the considerations made about the possible interest superior of the minor (son of the here complaining). Applied articles: Art. 30.2 RLOPD, 10.d) Law 12/2007, 11.2.d) HIM 1/1996, 5.2, 7.3 and 17 Law 14/2010, 236-18.2.c) CCCat

The claim of rights protection is loved for reasons of form. The claim is rejected regarding the background, to consider pertinent the denial of the cancellation of the data of the person complaining related to the process of in vitro fertilization that its clinical history has evidence about. Applied articles: 16 LOPD; 33 RLOPD, 4, 6, 9, 10, 12 Law 21/2000, 14, 15 Law 41/2002; 5, 30, 32, 117 Law 14/2010.