The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
183 results were found for your search terms Consent
Consent for the processing of data of minors in networks
IP 337/2019
It is filed on the basis of the principle of presumption of innocence, insofar as it has not been proven that consent for the processing of images of minors is not have lent freely.
11/06/2020
Collection and publication of data through a website
PS 44/2019
The right to information must be exercised in the collection of data. When consent is requested for more than one purpose, it must be specific. In order to comply with the transparency obligations, it is not necessary to publish the handwritten signature.
02/03/2020
Lack of accreditation of express consent to communicate health data.
PS 30/2019
The doctor of a hospital who treated the complainant during a medical treatment, sent a medical report to the head of the complainant, at the request of the complainant, who requested the sending of this report with the purpose of proving the reason and the expected duration of your medical leave, so that you can receive 100% of your salary. The complainant claims that he requested that an indicative report be sent only from those two ends (reason and duration of the discharge), and the Hospital has not proved that it had the express prior consent to send the other data of health listed in the report submitted, and which had nothing to do with the cause and duration of the treatment referred to, which constitutes a very serious infringement.
02/03/2020
Suppression of data of minors of a project of research
CNS 4/2020
The responsible has to suppress of profession the whole of particulars treated in motive of the realization of a survey within the framework of a project of research, the lack of consent validly conceded by the affected ones attended to. The exercise upward of suppression corresponds to the affected ones but nothing prevents from the AMPA of one of the participant educational centers in the project being able to address the responsible applicant the suppression of the data treated illicitly in relation to the pupils of its center.
25/02/2020
Data processing as a result of the participation of a Town Council in a Project of European research
CNS 47/2019
This report analyses the content of the documentation provided on a European research project, in particular in relation to the following issues: determination of liability or, where appropriate, co-responsibility of the processing; The information flows provided; International data Transfers (TID); Security; The use of anonymous data or pseudonimization. With regard to the processing of images captured with cameras by the city Council, this, as responsible, must have a sufficient legal base and must ensure compliance with the rest of the requirements of the data protection regulations. It is also necessary to provide an informed consent in the terms of article 4.11, and inform those affected (art. 13 RGPD).
18/11/2019
Report in relation to the Digital Administration Decree Project
PD 9/2019
29/07/2019
- SECTORIAL AREA
- E-administration
- Administrative procedure
- HABEAS DATA RIGHTS
- Do not be subject to automated decisions (including profiles)
- ENTITIES
- Public administration
- Autonomous community administration
- OBLIGATIONS
- Impact assessment
- PRINCIPLES
- Purpose limitation principle
- Historical, scientific or statistical purposes
- Lawfulness principle
- Consent
- In the public interest or in the exercise of official authority
- Data minimization principle
- TRANSPARENCY
- Active publicity
Seudonimitzades utilization of health data in biomedical research
CNS 15/2019
The seudonymisades data processing for purposes of biomedical research (section 2.d) of the DA 17th), it can find sufficient habilitation in juridical bases different to that of the consent article 6.1, e sections) and f), and article 9.2, j section), in connection with article 89.1 RGPD). When the foreseen circumstances contribute to the section 2.d) of the DA 17th of the LOPDGDD, the consent of the affected ones will not be indispensable to carry out the data processing of seudonymisades health. The responsible for the treatment has to have the necessary technical and organizational measures, in the terms that they derive from the regulations (articles 9.2.j), 89.1 and 32 RGPD). Among others, it has to give compliment to the foreseen demands in the sections 2.d), f) and g) of the DA 17th of the LOPDGDD.
14/05/2019
Data processing in the research in health
CNS 18/2019
For application of the regulations (art.9.2.j) and art. 89.1 RGPD), the section 2 of the DA 17th is the rule of internal law that regulates the data processing for purposes of research in health, and therefore results from full application to any type of research in health (with the specificities that are foreseen there). The reference to the “public health” contained to the letter b) of the section 2 of the DA 17th, it has to understand made to the research that is carried out within the framework of the LGSP. However, the forecasts of the letters d) f) and g) they have to understand themselves related to any research in health. The information that the responsible incorporates into the corporative web to the effects of complying with the article 13 of the RGPD has to be available in a clear and easily accessible way for the ones affected, during all the lifecycle of the data processing, for demand of the principle of transparency.
14/05/2019
Exercise of rights on the part of minors from the fourteen years
CNS 9/2019
The exercise of rights of informative self-determination for the parents or legal representatives of the biggest minor of 14 years does not require from authorization of this minor, and is not incompatible nor excludes the exercise for the minor himself, since both possibilities are in the regulations of application foreseen in the moment of issuing this report. This, without harm that, in determinate cases, and given the applicable regulations, the interest superior of the minor can found the limitation of the exercise of the rights of informative self-determination on the part of the holders of the parental authority.
06/03/2019
Interpretation of the article 13.5 of the organic Law 1/1996, of 15 January, of juridical protection of the minor
CNS 56/2018
The characteristics of the courses of object formation of consultation (very reduced percentage of affected minors and border of age of the minors) attended to, it does not seem that the requirement of the habitualitat coincides, for which, from the prospect of the data protection the treatment of special categories of data would be disproportionate (article 9.1 RGPD).
11/12/2018
Total number of pages: 19