The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
341 results were found for your search terms Lawfulness principle
Broadcast on the municipal website of the identity of the person who submitted an administrative contentious resource against the list of admitted and definitively excluded from a selection process.
PS 15/2022
It resolves to admonise the City Council of Vic as responsible for the infringement provided for in Article 83.5.a) in relation to the principle of application. In this regard, it is argued that the publication of a report on the website containing the identity of the person who formulated an administrative contentious appeal against the list of admitted persons and excluded from a selection process, without the legal basis for using this treatment, has been credited.
31/05/2022
BOE notification announcements post.
PS 12/2022
In the face of various attempts at notice on unsuccessful paper, a city council published in the BOE Notification Supplement several acts handed down in a disciplinary procedure to a municipal worker, committing three offences for which he was warned. Specifically:1) By violation of the principle of accuracy, by having made an attempt to notify an incorrect address;2) By violation of the principle of Application, by having published an ad in the BOE after having made a single prior notification attempt and an incorrect address; by having published another announcement in the BOE before running out the 10-day deadline granted to the person assigned to collect the documentation in the headquarters; and by having included in several announcements the name and surname of the person concerned, instead of his DNI.3) By violating the principle of minimization, by having included in several announcements in the BOE information on the disciplinary nature of the procedure, as well as other information.
26/05/2022
The right of access to the documentation of the administrative file by the interested party.
IP 35/2021
File resolution is dictated. There is a neighborhood conflict between two colindant properties which results in an administrative procedure with cross-instances. The two sides repeat the documentation presented by the other side. In this context, the city council facilitates the writing of inheritance facilitated by the here denouncing, the other party on the basis of Articles 4 and 53 LPAC, as a legitimate interested party with the right of access to the documentation of the file.
17/05/2022
Consultation padró municipal.
PS 19/2022
The initiation of the sanctioning procedure against the City Council is agreed to make an undue access to the municipal sponsor's data of the person's private address and use it to address a response to a request she had submitted in her professional status as the administrator of estates, rather than sending her the response to the professional address she had pointed to to that effect.
17/05/2022
Access by a social worker to the system of guaranteed citizenship income.
IP 90/2021
The whistleblower complained that a social worker had accessed information regarding her as a holder of guaranteed citizenship income (RGC), without her consent. Access took place during the processing of an individual school dining room grant, which had requested his exarella. Since the City Council had opened a social risk file of this family unit, in the processing of dining aid the City Council had to issue a social report with various information, including the income received by the family unit in RGC. In the RGC system, it was stated that the exparella was benefiting from RGC, and the denouncing person was the holder of the aid (who had requested it). The complaint is archived in the belief that the social worker accessed this information of the complainant, in office, and for the fulfilment of the tasks entrusted.
26/04/2022
Access to medical records by social educators
CNS 11/2022
On the basis of the regulations on patient autonomy, and the clinical documentation, in relation to the legal basis of article 6.1.e) and 9.2.h) of the RGPD, the access of social educators to information which consists in the medical history of patients generated by day mental health hospitals for adolescents would be enabled to the extent that it is relevant to the exercise of their functions. On the other hand, a priori, the access of social educators to the information that is part of the shared medical history of Catalonia (HC3) would not be justified. In the case of the proposed consultation, the fifteenth additional provision of Law 12/2007, relating to the communication of data between health services and social services of the public system, does not apply.
21/04/2022
Communication of data to unauthorized third parties.
PS 58/2021
The City Council revealed confidential information about the person complaining about a police file.The person was reported to the lawyer of his ex-husband, who was a GU agent, in particular, a report concerning a police action relating to the complainant.The officials of the Urban Guard who intervened in the facts of the aforementioned police file also reported these facts to the person's ex-husband.
20/04/2022
Remission of police information to a judge by allegedly incompetent person.
IP 73bis/2021
A Chief of a Police Basic Area responded to a request made by a judge (on whether a City Council requested the SIP user leave of the person complaining), when according to the person denouncing who should have responded is the head of the DSIP. The complaint is filed because it cannot be ruled out that it was the judge himself who requested the information to the head of the aforementioned ABP, either because it was his police reference for the Generalitat Police in the municipality to which the judicial body belonged, or because the City Council - subject to the consultation made by the Court - belonged to that ABP. On the other hand, if the head of the ABP had access to the information requested by the Court, he would be legitimized for communicating it to the court. Nor can it be ruled out that the head of the DSIP had authorized it.
20/04/2022
Unencrypted email DSIP and incompetent person, request hearings on improper access to SIP.
IP 73/2021
It was reported that a chief of the Urban Guard of a City Council, (1) had sent an unencrypted email to the head of the unit in charge of managing the Police Information Systems (SIP) requesting that the person complaining be unpaid as a user of the SIP, in contravention of the SIP Security Manual. He also denounced (2) that the City Council had requested audits of access to the SIP made by the complainant, without legal cause and to a person who was not responsible. The complaint is filed for the following reasons: (1) it is not known that the mail was sent unencrypted (and in any case the facts would be prescribed), and the sending of the mail to the security chief would be covered by the fulfilment of the functions entrusted to the head of the PL; (2) As regards the requests for audit, they are not specific to which requests it refers, there is no record of them being sent to the incompetent person, nor the rule that would have been contravened. In any case, the complainant already filed a complaint with the Authority, concerning the application of an audit application for alleged misuse of the SIP, and the Authority filed the complaint on the grounds that the audit request was legitimate.
20/04/2022
Use of a database with tax information for a different purpose
CNS 8/2022
The City Council may use the information available to homes in respect of which there is no water consumption or people registered in the last two years, as well as data from the IBI Register relating to the owners of these homes, with the purpose of applying the surcharge provided for in Article 72.4 of the TRLHL.
24/03/2022
Total number of pages: 35