The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
707 results were found
Access to the clinical course.
PT 106/2022
The complaining party initiated the present rights protection procedure before this Authority as it considered that the requested entity gave it the requested information (clinical course of visits of 12.09.22 and 21.09.22) in a manipulated manner. In this regard, it demanded access to the original annotations made by doctors doctors to the clinical course of the two reference visits. Well, in consultation with this Authority, the Hospital Clinico has stated that the information it gave to the complainant, in response to his request, is the original version of the notes that doctors made in the clinical course, and that this documentation has not been manipulated or modified. In this regard, the content of the Hospital's response was transferred to the requesting party, so that it would submit the allegations or evidence it considered relevant, warning it that, if within 10 days it did not submit any writings, it would be understood that the Hospital had fully complied with its application for access. After this period, the complaining party has argued nothing against considering their right of access satisfied, which is why it should be concluded that the information that the Hospital gave to the complainant, in response to his request, was all that was in their power. That being the case, it is appropriate to reject the complaint, because the entity gave a full response within the legally envisaged deadline, to the specific terms of the application.
16/03/2023
Disregard of the right of access.
PT 118/2022
The right of access that the claimant formulated to the City Council of Sant Quirze del Vallès is estimated in relation to the purpose of processing the data provided to a municipal school. The City Council alleged that the petition had not been presented in the proper way and that it referred to data from a collective.
02/03/2023
It disregards the right of access to data.
PT 103/2022
The claimant requested the right of access to his data (copy of medical documentation and medical record). The Department replied to him within a deadline, although there is no record of him providing the requested information. Following the reiteration of his request on two more occasions, the Department tried to submit all the requested documentation, but the complainant refused to receive it. The complaint is dismissed on the grounds that the Department would have fulfilled its obligation, even if the person refused to receive the requested documentation.
14/02/2023
Right to erase police records.
PT 4/2023
The resolution of the DGP is declared untimely, given that the right to erasure was resolved and notified beyond the 1 month deadline established for the purpose, without going into other considerations with regard to the substance, since the DGP has decided to delete the data of the complainant.
14/02/2023
Request for access to clinical history and its traceability.
PT 68/2022
The claim was partially considered when it was noted, with regard to the traceability application, that there was no need to report on the identity of the natural persons who accessed the HC; and with regard to the copy of the HC, that although the ICS had submitted copy of the clinical course, it was missing to submit a medical report, as well as to inform the complainant that they did not have the other medical documentation cited in the submitted documentation.
07/02/2023
It disregards the right to erase police data.
PT 116/2022
The resolution of the DGP is declared untimely, given that the right to erasure was resolved and notified beyond the 1 month deadline established for the purpose, without going into other considerations with regard to the substance, since the DGP has decided to delete the data of the complainant.
07/02/2023
The right of access to the list of companies is one third of the personal data of the complainant.
PT 89/2022
The entity must answer clearly and precisely whether the personal data of the complainant has been transferred to third parties or not, and if so, identify the recipients of the personal data. The entity must inform the complainant of the specific reasons why it is decided not to follow up one of the requests made by the complainant.
02/02/2023
It disregards the right to erase police data.
PT 115/2022
The resolution of the DGP is declared untimely, given that the right to erasure was resolved and notified beyond the 1 month deadline established for the purpose, without going into other considerations with regard to the substance, since the DGP has decided to delete the data of the complainant.
02/02/2023
Disappointment of the right to erasure to police data.
PT 112/2022
The resolution of the Directorate-General of Police which estimates the request for the deletion of personal data contained in the complainant's SIP PF file, without going into other considerations with regard to the substance, is extemporaneous, since the DGP has decided to delete its data.
02/02/2023
Disappointment of the right to erasure to police data.
PT 114/2022
The resolution of the DGP is declared untimely, since the right of suppression was resolved and notified beyond the 1 month deadline established for the purpose, without going into other considerations with regard to the substance, since the DGP resolved to delete the data of the complainant.
25/01/2023
Total number of pages: 71