Result of the resolution: Upheld
It is credited that the CSMA did not make effective the right of access exercised by the claimant, since in the face of his request he limited himself to submitting to him a report from the psychiatrist visiting him, which made no reference to any of the requested endpoints, concerning the month of August 2018: information concerning the communication of his medical data to his parents, the application for involuntary membership and the interview that his psychiatrist would have held with his parents. In this regard, it should be borne in mind that it is part of the right of access provided for in Article 15 GDPR, the right to know whether or not the person responsible has the data in respect of which that right is exercised, and the right to know data communications to third parties. In the above, the claim is estimated and the claim is declared the right of the claimant to obtain the information requested from the CSMA in his files, as well as, in the event that no such information is available, to be explicitly stated, specifying the reason, and to be informed about the communication of data to third parties.