Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The data protection regulations do not prevent the councillor from accessing the death registry corresponding to the years 1885-1890, 1918-1921, 1957-1959 and 1968-1969, except for the health data that may appear (specifically data on hereditary diseases prior to 1 January 1959). As for the minutes books, it is necessary to give access to the minutes book, unless there are special categories of data of the people to whom they affect the agreements adopted. In relation to the correspondence relating to the same periods, it would not be adjusted to the data protection regulations to indiscriminately facilitate access to the correspondence of living persons, but it is necessary to make a case-by-case analysis, in view of the interest of the councilor in the access and the type of information to which the correspondence refers.

City councils can use the personal data contained in the Municipal Register of Inhabitants to identify minors of compulsory school age and get in touch with their families to exercise the powers that correspond to them with regard to the pre-registration process. The tax regulations do not allow the consultation of tax information, in a general way and without the consent of the people affected, in order to be able to detect the existence of specific socio-economic situations prior to the pre-registration application. The compatibility of using other databases or administrative records such as those described in the conduct cannot be ruled out, although the terms in which this exchange of information is described in the query (volume of information, people affected , when it would be carried out, etc.) pose serious problems from the point of view of the proportionality of the measure.

The data protection regulations do not prevent the person from accessing the report on the investigation of a performance by the Mossos d'Esquadra at a demonstration, as well as knowing whether the investigation of these events sanctioned any squadron bites, the sanction imposed on him or her and the reason, prior to anonymization of the personal data of the agents concerned. In addition, the personal data protection regulations do not prevent access to the identification data of the administrative staff who have been involved in the preparation of the aforementioned report and are included in this document.

The complainant has the right to access all the information about the person in the file and in the requested documentation, including the origin of the information and, therefore, the identity of persons who have provided information about the complainant (Article 15 GDPR). Data protection regulations do not prevent the complainant from having access to the information in the terms in which he or she requests, that is, anonymized copy of the file, and documents that relate to the investigation of his or her conduct as a convicted person, excluding unnecessary identification information from access to the effects of the principle of minimization (art. 5.1.c) GDPR), as well as information worthy of special protection from third parties (e.g. art. 23 LTC). Nor would it be justified to have access to other personal information on third parties that may appear in the requested documentation (Art. 24.2 LTC), access that the complainant does not request either. Data protection regulations do not prevent the claimant from accessing the merely identifying data of the members of the Commissions in charge of the assessment and investigation of the reported facts and/or of the public employees that may appear in the requested documentation, including the certificate it requests.

The communication of the identification and data relating to the address of the sponsor of the metropolitan waste treatment tax to a city council, in order to constitute the sponsor of the municipal waste rate, can be considered legitimate since these are compatible purposes and respond to the exercise of the respective competences in the same matter.

The principles contained in article 24 of the LOPGDD and, specifically, for the purposes of consultation, the principle of limitation of the data retention period, according to which the data must be kept in the system the essential time to decide on the origin of initiating an investigation, are applicable to the processing of personal data of the Ethical Mailbox of the Generalitat de Catalunya. On the other hand, the specific deadlines provided for in Article 24 are not applicable. The storage periods of personal data provided for in the Agreement of Gov/96/2020 are not contrary to the principle of limitation of the storage period provided for in the regulations on the protection of personal data.

No s'exerceix el dret regulat a l'article 15 de l'RGPD quan s'exerceix el dret d'accés a la informació pública. Correspon a la GAIP tutelar el dret d'accés a la informació pública.

The claim is estimated for formal reasons, as the PDB did not respond within the legally established timeframe. There is no need to give an opinion on the substance, given that, in an extemporaneous manner and once the complaint has been filed, the PGI estimated the request for the cancellation of police records.

The complaint is filed because the rail agent who, to fill in a bullet of minimum perception, requested the name and surnames and DNI of the user of Rodalies Catalunya who traveled without ticket, exercised an inspectorate established by rules with a range of law.