Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The responsible for the treatment has to guarantee the accuracy of the data. In the present case, the responsible linked the one determinate report to the DNI of the accusing person, who was foreign to that report. This entailed|meant that when the accusing person accessed the civic folder of the virtual office of formalities, he|she|it could access information linked to that report.

The complainant may access the e-mail addresses corresponding to his professional contacts but not, for the information available, retrieve the content of the professional e-mails he sent or received through his corporate e-mail corresponding to the time period that he served as a sergeant in charge of the Local Police.

The complainant filed an appeal for replenishment before the City Council, complaining that the City Council notified him of the resolution of the appeal and in the section of the resolution the data of the resource of a legal entity was displayed. Furthermore, the complainant expressed concern that the City Council could have supplied its data to a third party. It is archived, because legal persons are excluded from protection under data protection regulations and because there is no indication that they support the concerns of the complainant.

The school is reported to have committed two offences: Firstly, a minor offence (Art. 83.5.b GDPR and Art. 74.a LOPDGDD) for having collected, through a form accessible via the school website, data from applicants for free dentistry treatment provided by pupils within the framework of the practices of two academic courses, without having previously informed them of all the ends envisaged in the art. 13 GDPR, and a fine of EUR 1000 is imposed. And secondly, a very serious infringement (Art. 83.5.a GDPR and art. 72.1.i LOPDGDD), for having allowed unrestricted access, through a school Internet address, to the data of applicants for dentistry treatment, in violation of their duty of confidentiality, and imposing a fine of 4,000 euros.

The capture of images of people transiting through the public way beyond what is inevitable to achieve the building's security purpose and the people accessing it contravenes the principle of minimization. In the area of video surveillance, apart from reporting the existence of cameras through a poster, the person responsible must keep the information provided for in Article 13 of the GPD at the disposal of the persons concerned.

The access on the part of the medical staff evaluating of the ICAM, to the clinical history of the immersed persons in a process of disability, would be fitted out for the foreseen juridical basis in the article|item 6.1.e) , and 9.2.h) of the RGPD, regarding the treatment of the data of health.
AGREEMENT OF BEGINNING.
The clinical history of the persons who go to the ICAM, is accused of the access on the part of the staff of infirmary|nursing. It|He|She was not the Decree-Law 48/2020 that fitted out this access until December of 2020 that were dictated. Therefore, until this date the access on the part of this staff was not lawful

The Town Council facilitated the access to a third person to|in the applications shown|presented by the accusing persons, without concealing the particulars contain to|in these applications. Breach of the principle|beginning of confidentiality ( art.5.1.f. RGPD).

SCT, as a responsible for the treatment, did not keep vigil because the datum of the address|home used by the ATC for the practice of the notification of the provision of constraint to the person sanctioned by a driving offense, it was the pertinent one, that it|he|she would be the one that figures in the Register|Record of vehicles (art. 90 of the RDL 6/2015, of 30 October), and that to|in such effects it|he|she communicated the affected person.

Innocence is filed, on the one hand, with regard to the law|right of presumption because there is not any evidence that allows to infer that an offense has been committed and the Town Council denies the facts; and of the other one, with regard to the law|right of access to the information, that in the case of urbanistic matter|subject, allows all persons to access the reports of urbanistic legalization without the need for proving special legitimation (public action|share).

The requesting parent has the right to access a copy of the referral report prepared by the social services, except for the information that refers to the contact details of the other parent, as well as the data of the partner. this one and his daughter. This, except with regard to information affecting minor children, may also have to be restricted in the event that social services detect that there is a conflict of interest between the interests of the requesting parent and those of the minor children. to justify it.