Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The accusing person exposed that presented an application in front the asking Town Council information related to the permissions|permits and authorizations|accreditations that he|she|it grants particular entities and political parties for the installation of elements the Town Council on the public way|railway, and that the Town Council would have revealed its|his|her|their surname in the ANC (...), and this would have published it in|on its|his|her|their account|bill of Facebook. The Authority only him competent to know of the extremes|ends of it|he|she denounces it|her related with the treatments that the Town Council of (...) he|she had been able to make with respect to the revelation of the data of the accusing person, but not with respect to the posterior publication of these data for the ANC (...) in|on the platform of Facebook, because this entity remains out of the competence area of the Authority. Is filed, because of the performances|actions of previous information carried out by this Authority no evidence has observed that it|he|she allows to infer that the Town Council had developed|revealed in the ANC (...) the surname of the person here denouncing in relation to the presentation of applications in front of the Town Council.

The complaint relating to alleged wrong access to the clinical history of the complainant is filed, since the ICS and GSS have justified each of the access made.

Declare extemporaneous resolution of cancellation requests. The requested entity estimates the request for the cancellation of the police background.

The court, within the framework of a penal procedure, required the policemen|lads|police so that they informed about some determinate performances|actions related to the husband of the accusing person. The report of the police included some performances|actions related to the accusing person. The data communicated by the police in|on the judicial organ are linked to the judicial requirement, since they refer to the same facts that the judicial organ had to judge. The communication of data in|on the judicial organ is protected by the judicial requirement

The complaint|denunciation is filed since, in first place, undue accesses to clinical history are not observed; and in second place there is any evidence neither that no leak of the information contained in the clinical history has been produced. Presumption of innocence.

The Town Council, through its|his|her|their profile of Facebook, an air image spread of Google Maps that identified two marked houses|housings with a blue circle. This image correlated with two photographs and a text where a dump|spill of wastewaters|sewage was denounced on the public way|railway. The principle|beginning of legality is harmed, since particulars are treated without respecting the principle|beginning of relative legality to|in the data processing personal.

The junction of anonymized data coming from different sources in order to develop a mathematical model for the prevention of epidemics and pandemics could end up identifying concrete persons, for which it is necessary to measure, to evaluate and to manage this risk of re-identification adopting the measures adapted to reduce it.

Activation of the camera during online classes can generally be considered a lawful treatment, given the obligation of schools to ensure and ensure the educational function in relation to the students affected and the fulfillment of a mission in public interest (eg art. 6.1.e) RGPD), and the forecasts established by the health and education authorities in the context of a pandemic, without the need for the consent of those affected. In any case, the principle of proportionality must be taken into account. The Foundation may urge students to have the camera activated during the online class if necessary for its development, without prejudice to the possibility that the affected persons may exercise the right of opposition in view of their particular situation.

In order to minimize the risks to the security of civil servants who are victims of gender-based violence in the various publications of the general competitions for merit and capacity in which they participate and until the protocol referred to in section 2 of the DA7a of the LOPDGDD, pseudonymous data could be used both for the identification of the contestants who hold such a condition, and for the identification of the place awarded to each of the contestants.

In the case at hand, and in view of the data protection regulations, it would not be justified to deliver the document of the report of qualifications of the test concert / final work of the master, relative to the course 2018/2019, in the measure that may negatively affect the academic, professional, social and family sphere of students, but this information should be anonymized. However, it would be possible to provide the merely identifying information contained in the minutes and relating to the professor or members of the court who issued it, except for their number of the national identity document, or equivalent document, as well. such as the handwritten signature or, in the case of an electronic signature, the properties of the electronic certificate used, if any. However, it is possible to access the date of incorporation of the grades in the personal files of the students insofar as it cannot be related to these.