Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

When the right of access is exercised, the person concerned has the right to obtain information about the origin of their data - which means access to the identity of the people who made the complaints - unless it is proven that opposition to access is based on a particular situation, which has not been proven here. Since the right of access cannot adversely affect the rights and freedoms of others, the claim regarding access to the claims, opinions or explanations made by these people, linked or related to their own working situation, or to their mood, psychological or physical.

The claim is estimated for formal reasons, as the PDB did not respond within the legally established timeframe. There is no need to give an opinion on the substance, given that, in an extemporaneous manner and once the complaint has been filed, the PDB estimated the application for access.

The Department of Health entrusted|ordered SEMSA the recruitment of the service of follow-up of the narrow contacts with infected persons of covid-19, which entailed|meant the data processing personal. And to|in such effect SEMSA hired the private company Ferroser Servicios Auxiliares, SA, without formalizing the order of the treatment in a contract as the art requires. 28 RGPD, which it|he is constitutive of offense.

The regulations of data protection do not result from application personal in the installed cameras, but that they have not entered in functioning|operation yet.

The claim for formal motives is loved, since the DGP did not give answer in the legally established deadline|installment. It is not necessary to speak about the background|bottom, since, in a way extemporaneous and once presented the claim, the DGP loved the request of access.

The telephone number and e-mail address, as long as it can be directly or indirectly associated with an individual, are personal data whose processing must comply with the principles and guarantees of data protection regulations. The publication of data relating to the name of the establishment, the industrial address of the establishment, telephone number, e-mail address, website, direct link to the location on the map and geographical location coordinates of the companies registered in the RIAAC, may based on the consent of those affected. The dissemination of this data may also be based on the provisions of Articles 19.3 LOPDGDD and 6.4 RGPD, provided that the persons concerned are offered the possibility of requesting the exclusion of their company from the dissemination.

The data protection regulations do not give the City Council sufficient authorization to install a video surveillance system on public roads in order to control and, where appropriate, exercise the sanctioning power with respect to uncivil conduct relating to the dumping of waste. in the collection areas. In the event that the City Council installs a video surveillance system in closed and delimited waste collection areas, and not on public roads, it would be necessary to comply with the principles and guarantees of personal data protection regulations in the terms provided. in the RGPD, the LOPDGDD and Instruction 1/2009.

Given the information available, data protection regulations would not prevent access to information relating to the identification (name and surname, position or professional contact details) of referents of disability in civic centers.

Since, for the information of which it is ordered, we would be in the face of a procedure not finished in the moment of the request of access, in which the complaining person would show the condition of interested, and the rest of concurrent circumstances, it is necessary to recognize the right of the complaining person to access and to obtain copy of the Report of the Inspection of Education and, if it suits, another documentation elaborated in the sinus of the phase of previous research. This, without harm of omitting those data that are unnecessary or irrelevant for the defense of its rights and legitimate interests, as it exposes itself to the report.

The external offices of the entity may collect and process corporate contact details and, therefore, send electronic communications on the services and activities offered by the entity, on the basis of article 6.1.e) RGPD and the Article 19.3 LOPDGDD, although, in the event of not taking the form of any of the entities referred to in Article 77.1 LOPDGDD, Article 19.2 LOPDGDD would apply. This is without prejudice to the fact that they must also adapt their activity, where applicable, to the regulations in force in the different states in which they operate.